My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10784
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10784
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:40:11 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:31:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/14/1995
Doc Name
APPENDIX B.2 CPT PROBES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'" <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CPT-4A 1 75.5 5/ 1/95 <br />CPT-4A2 80.2 5/1/95 <br />CPT-4B 72,5 5/1/95 <br />CPT-4C 57.9 5/1/95 <br />The stnttigraphic interpretation is based on relationships between tip resistance (Qc), sleeve friction <br />(Fs), and dynamic pore pressure (IJt). The friction ratio, (Ri) (sleeve friction divided by cone <br />bearing), is a calculated parameter which is used to infer soil behavior type. Differential pore pressure <br />ratio (excess pore pressure divided by cone bearing) is also calculated. It assists in fine tuning the soil <br />irrterpretatioa Generally, cohesive soils have high friction ratios, low cone bearing and generate large <br />excess pore water pressures. Cohesioriless soils have lower fiiction ratios, high cone bearing and <br />generate little in the way of excess pore water pressures. <br />The interpretation of the CPT data collected on this project was carried out using the correlations <br />in Figure 2, developed by Campanella and Robertson, 1988. It should be noted that it is not always <br />possible to clearly identify a soil type based on Qc, Fs and Ut. Occasionally soils will fall within <br />differertt soil categories on the classification charts. In these situations, experience and judgement and <br />an assessment of the pore pressure dissipation data should be used to infer the soil behavior type. <br />Computer tabulations of the interpreted soil types along with certain other geotechnical pazameters <br />for each cone hole are presented in Appendix B. <br />3.2 Pore Pressure Dissipation Data <br />Two' pore pressure dissipation tests were performed during CPT-4A2. The dissipations were <br />performed in thin silt lenses which had elevated dynamic pore pressures. The tests were performed <br />at 64 ft (19.5 m) and 70.5 ft (21.5 m). The test at 64 ft started with a pore pressure of 18.1 psi and <br />dissipated to 3.4 psi after 10 minutes. The test at 70.5 ft started with a pore pressure of 11.2 psi and <br />dissipated to 2.4 psi after 5 minutes. Plots of the two tests are in Appendix C. <br />The dynamic pore pressures from the CPT soundings indicate that the tailings became saturated at <br />depths of 20 to 30 feet. However, there is no clear hydrostatic water level in tailings. There were <br />only thin zones with elevated dynamic pore pressure, between sandier zones with little or no dynamic <br />pore pressure. <br />3.3 Seismic Data <br />The pertinent data for each of the seismic profiles are presented in tabular form in Appendix D. The <br />shear wave velocity profiles for each CPT location can be found in Appendix E. The velocity profiles <br />display the shear wave velocity plotted at a depth midway between the one meter test intervals. The <br />measured shear wave velocities were generally between about 400 ft/s and 800 ft/s. <br />CoNC7EC, INC. 3 Dmvc, Colorado <br />LJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.