Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' In all of the soundings, the CPTs were terminated when the drill rigs hydraulics were not able to <br />advance the cone any further. <br />2.2 Downhole Seismic Testing <br />The equipment and procedures used for determining shear wave velocities were in general as reported <br />by Robertson et al, 1992. The procedure was incorporated within the CPT and conducted when <br />penetration was stopped to add additional push rods. At the end of the second push and at one meter <br />intervals thereafter, shear wave velocity measurements were made. The CPT rods are one meter long, <br />and therefore accurate depth irnervals were ensured by always pushing the cone rods one meter. <br />Before taking shear wave velocity measurements, the rods were decoupled from the drill rig to <br />min;mi~e background noise. <br />' Shear waves were generated by striking an auger which was set in place by the drill rig. This provided <br />excelled coupling of the shear source to the ground surface. The auger was offset hotizontaIIy from <br />the cone rods at varying distances, which were recorded. This offset was accounted for in the <br />' velocity calculations. <br />A friction reducer was used to reduce the friction between the soils penetrated and the cone rods <br />behind the cone. The particular reducer used is oversized compazed to conventio~i reducers to <br />facilitate the decoupling of the cone rods from the sor7s in an effort to produce a high quality signal <br />and high signal to noise ratio. <br />The auger was struck lightly for shear wave generation using a l O lb. sledge hammer in a horizontal <br />direction, parallel to the active axis of the seismic receiver. Each wave was inspected and the <br />' . procedure was repeated if necessary. An electrical contact trigger between the auger and the hammer <br />produced accurate triggering times which allowed for the accurate timing of S wave markers. <br />' After each wave trace was recorded, inspected and saved, the traces were examined on a digital <br />oscilloscope to select signal markers for interval time computations. The field technique employed <br />' for determination of shear wave velocity is known as the pseudo interval method. <br />The shear wave receiver used was a horizontally active geophone located in the body of the <br />1 piezocone. The geophone is located 0.2 meters behind the cone tip. This offset is accounted for;n <br />all calculations. The oscilloscope sampled at a frequency of 20 kHz (ie: 20,000 samples per second). <br />In general, 5,000 sample points were taken per wave trace. The AJD resolution of the oscilloscope <br />used was 8 bit. Because shear wave signals attenuate significantly in soils, the input sensitivity (gain) <br />of the receiver was increased with depth to maintain acceptable signal resolution. <br />2.3 SPTs Energy Calibration Testing <br />' Three borings were drilled near three of the CPT holes. These borings were used for correlation of <br />the CPT results with samples of the tailings. The samples of the tailings were taken using a 3-inch <br />OD split spoon sampler. The sampler was driven in 24 inch increments using the 140 Ib. auto <br />' CoNerkC.lxG Z pmvc. Colorado <br /> <br />