My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP10685
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP10685
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:40:06 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/15/2002
Doc Name
2002 Erosion Inventory Report
From
WWC Engineering
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Stability Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a given site to be documented. Technical Note No. 346 is provided in Permit No. C-80-001 as <br />Appendix 4.3-B. <br />The condition of the individual flow features previously mentioned were measured using <br />method I ("Cross-Section Survey") outlined in Permit No. C-80-001, Section 4.3. This method <br />was chosen to determine the rate of degradation or agradation within these reaches over time. <br />The stability of the hillslope was measured using a modification of the individual feature <br />method. In this case, a reference stake was placed on each side of the suspected movement azea <br />with two stakes placed in the monitored area to form astraight-line transect. Any offset of the <br />' center stakes was then noted. Two transects were placed on the hillslope to determine if any <br />differential movement within the suspect hillslope occurred. <br />MONITORING INFORMATION <br />MOFFAT AREA SUMMARY <br />~ Ten separate blocks are designated in the Moffat Area. These areas are shown on Exhibit <br />' 1, Sheet 1 of 2, of this report. Table I provides a summary of the inventory data and is followed <br />by a brief description of each area and the corrective measures performed on each block as a <br />result of previous inventories. The numerical value for each block represents the composite <br />' erosion condition soil surface factor (SSF) score as determined by the inventory methods. <br />All of the blocks scored in the stable category during this survey. The relatively low <br />' values were in part due to increased vegetative cover. In addition, the winter of 2001-2002 was <br />very mild with low precipitation and little runoff. This permitted 2001 repairs to establish <br />vegetation and vegetation in stable ril]s and gullies to become better established. Some rills and <br />~ gullies in Block 6 will be repaired in 2002. <br />Table 1: Moffat Area Erosion Inventory Data Summary <br />Area 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 <br />Blocks 4 4 6 6 12 18 17 22 <br />Block 2 4 4 4 6 6 12 26 18 <br />Block 3 6 6 6 9 12 18 21 23 <br />Block 4 4 4 6 9 12 18 18 26 <br />Block 5 12 12 18 6 6 9 21 32 <br />Block6 ll II II 9 9 IS 24 26 <br />Block 7 6 6 9 9 9 24 20 43 <br />Block 8 9 9 2 9 9 25 24 43 <br />Block 9 I I 11 6 6 6 24 30 37 <br />Block 10 6 12 12 9 9 36 <br />2 WWC Engineering <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.