Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2: Ability to Control Ratings <br />Favorable Conditions Broadleaf Plant Species Present Water Resources Rating <br />Easily implemented Absent Absent 3 <br />Addi[ional caze needed Present/Absent Present/ Absent Z <br />Additional care needed Present Present 1 <br />Each site's sub-rankings will be added to determine its overall treatment priority ranking (from 1 <br />to 9). The treatment priority ranking of each of these sites can be reviewed in Table 2 of the <br />Climax Mine 1999 Noxious and Tazgeted Weed Survey. Weed control and eradication efforts <br />targeted and prioritized infested sites based on their treatment priority ranking. <br />2005 Weed Management Activities <br />Weed control management activities at Climax were performed on July 15, 2005. Management <br />activities were based on the infestation site ranking from the 1999 Weed Survey which <br />prioritized application of weed control measures. <br />Application of chemical herbicides was the primary weed control method used. Tordon 22K and <br />Amine 2,4-D were mixed and applied directly to individual weeds or weed populations whenever <br />possible. The amount of Tordon 22K and Amine 2,4-D herbicide applied in 2003 was 28 ounces <br />and 108 ounces, respectively, in 80 gallons of water. LI-700 (28 ounces) surfactant was added to <br />the Tordon/2,4-D herbicide mix to facilitate adhesion and expedite drying following application. <br />Enhancing adhesion and accelerating drying serves to increase herbicide effectiveness. Blue dye <br />(20 ounces) was also added to the herbicide mixture in order to effectively track azeas where <br />herbicide had been applied. Labels of the herbicides used on the project azea aze contained in <br />Appendix A. <br />Habitat Management, Inc. <br />12/20/05 <br />