My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP09814
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP09814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:20 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/24/1994
Doc Name
1993 AHR & ARR Response to Report
From
COORS ENERGY CO
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />effected the static water level in CEC'e monitoring wells. <br />PH Levels <br />The pH levels recorded on pages 6-8 are the data taken from in-house <br />tfield> recordings. <br />Aa you knor, CEC continued to dorn size in 1993; chile this is <br />essential to our operation, inconaiatenciea do occur. It is hard to <br />replace individuals rho are knorledgeable and technically qualified <br />with a multi-assignment, multi-3ob-role individual. While, the field <br />meter calibrations could have been incorrect, I feel that both the <br />meter calibration end the individuals taking the reading need to be <br />more consistent. CEC rill make sure this is corrected in the future. <br />The laboratory pH levels are consistent throughout the year tSee <br />Attached). The field readings should be relatively close to the <br />laboratory analysis varying no more than 1 point. <br />AMW-2 <br />Unlike, AMW-1 rhich is completed <br />correlation to the existing subs <br />located at the south west corner <br />realistically completed directly <br />ground rater. AMW-2 is located <br />farthest easterly, dorn gradient <br />area. <br />in a undisturbed area, with a direct <br />~rface rater table and SMW-2 which is <br />of the permanent spoil area and is <br />adjacent to the original subsurface <br />in "A" Pit spoil material and ie the <br />monitoring cell in the disturbed <br />Ground-rater floc is to the northeast across the mine site and is <br />largely controlled by the top of bedrock rhich also slopes to the <br />northeast (SEE Section 2.04.7 Permit). Therefore, AMW-2 ie <br />essentially cut-off from the natural subsurface rater migration by "A" <br />Pit to the south and massive disturbed amounts of spoil to the east. <br />Aa the subsurface rater table recharge activities occur in the mined <br />out areas, AMW-2 rill more than likely be the last Well to confirm <br />stabilization of ground-rater. <br />Vecetation <br />CEC hoe solicited Savage and Savage to address permit defects in our <br />Reclamation Plan and to carry out the Vegetation Study for 1994. Mr. <br />Michael Savage discussed our circumatancea with Mr. Waldron directly <br />and came to an agreement over issues that needed to be addressed. (See <br />Savage and Savage Attached) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.