Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2. Provides a comparison of the acreage values provided in Section 3.1.2.2 of the <br />• permit and [he final disposition of the acreage in the field. <br />Table 2. <br />Affected Area Disposition <br />per Section 3.1.2.2 <br />of Permit Seeded Retained Facility[ UndisturbedZ Total <br />West Ridge <br />581.8 576.8 5.0 581.8 <br />Moffat <br />342.5 342.5 342.5 <br />Facilities <br />305.0 128.2 71.0 105.8 305.0 <br />Center Ridge <br />15.6 15.6 L5.6 <br />East Ridge <br />37.5 37.5 37.5 <br />South-of-Shop <br />10.5 10.5 10.5 <br />Totals 1111.1 76.0 105.8 1292.9 <br />• <br />1 Acreage in this category include: West Ridge -retained road segment within the mining <br />area as depicted on Exhibit 3.1-3 (major disturbance). Facilities -all other retained roads, <br />upper facilities area, lower facilities :uea, permanent impoundments with associated <br />permanent and temporary ditches (i.e. north Moffat ditch and south Moffat ditch <br />extension), and the tipple pond area. <br />2 Acreage in this category consists primarily of excess haul road, access road, and utility <br />corridor widths designated as affected but not actually disturbed (see exhibit 3.1-3 of <br />permit). Most haul roads had a designated affected width of 400 feet while less than 150 <br />feet was actually affected. Additionally several acres upslope of the Moffat pond were <br />designated as affected but not actually disturbed. <br /> <br />