My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP09352
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP09352
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:39:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:06:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/22/1982
Doc Name
SOIL TRANSECT SAMPLING FOR RADIONUCLIDES FOR THE ORE SORTER REJECT & MINE WASTE DUMP COTTER CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Dick Gamewell <br />June 22, 1982 <br />Page - Four - <br />Cotter and is located upstream from the ore sorter and water treatment <br />plant. The two remining wells, Numbers 31260 and 22212 are located in <br />a different hydrologic regime. <br />Division of Water Resources (October 20, 1981) <br />Comment No. 1 - "No information has been submitted concerning the ground <br />water occurrence or monitoring. Since ground water was encountered in <br />test holes, monitoring should be required. We would suggest a shallow <br />monitoring well on the southwest side of Ralston Creek downstream of <br />the ore sorter and treated water discharge." <br />Response to Comment No. 1 - Cotter has committed to collecting quarterly <br />samples at the three wells located onsite, down gradient from the water <br />treatment discharge. It should be noted that the basis for inonit~~ring <br />these wells has nothing to do with the fact that the wells encountered <br />water; in fact, it is not surprising that they encountered water since <br />the perforated interval of each well is in the Ralston Creek alluvium. <br />The wells will be monitored in conjunction with creek monitoring 3s a <br />means of assuring that anomalous concentrations of radionuclides, if <br />any, do not go undetected. <br />Comment No. 2 - "Our records indicate a total of five permitted o-,alls <br />in the vicinity of the site in sections 25 and 31. The applicant should <br />locate these wells and perhaps monitor any downstream wells." <br />Response to Comment No. 2 - Referring to Cotter's response to Coinnent <br />No. 1 from the Division of Water Resources' October 21, 1981 letter, <br />none of the wells cited by the Division of Water Resources are daNn- <br />stream (down gradient) of the site. <br />Comment No. 3 - "In order to prevent washing of radioactive fines into <br />Ralston Creek, a low berm should be constructed between the waste pile <br />and Ralston Creek." <br />Response to Comment No. 3 - All rock processed by the ore sorter is <br />washed free of fines. None of the ore sorter waste rock is covered <br />~•,ith fines. All fines from the ore sorter wash water circuit are <br />passed through a thickener and a drum filter and trucked to Cotter's <br />Canon City mill for disposal. <br />Comment No. 4 - "To prevent washing of fines into Ralston Creek or <br />Ralston Reservoir from the Ore Shipment Pad, a low berm sViould be con- <br />structed around the pad. Covering of the ore piles should be considered <br />to eliminate wind blown dust from entering the Creek or Reservoir." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.