My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP06819
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP06819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:37:11 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 11:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/11/2000
Doc Name
1999 Revegetation Monitoring Report
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Herbaceous production performance standard (weighted by percent of affected area) = 1053 <br />Ib/ac. <br />90 percent of performance standard = 0.9 x 1053 = 948 Ib/ac <br />' Seneca II-W extended reference area values from data collected in 1999 <br />° Seneca II-WS extended reference area values from data collected in 1997 <br />Woody Plant Density <br />The woody plant density standard applicable to these lands as of 1999 is 2000 stems per acre. <br />1995 reclamation averaged 170 woody plant stems per acre, and 1997 reclamation averaged 275 <br />woody plant stems per acre (Figure 3, Tables 3, 6 and 13) . These values are very typical of <br />what has been observed over the long term in reclaimed areas at the nearby Seneca II Mine. In <br />the 1995 reclaimed areas, the bulk of the total density was, as is typical, big sagebrush and <br />mountain snowberry, but serviceberry comprised slightly over 10 percent of the total which is <br />encouraging for the long-term. In the 1997 reclamation (some areas of which had been planted <br />with tubling nursery stock), serviceberry was over 20 percent of the total density and Gambel's <br />oak was over 10 percent of the total. Thus, although the absolute numbers per acre are not <br />much different than previous experience in the area, and still are not particularly close to the 2000 <br />stems/ac standard, the species composition of these areas includes species that can be <br />considered important to the viability of these areas over the long-term. As the vegetation of the <br />reclaimed areas responds to climate and management, among other environmental variables, it <br />will be important that species representing principal components of the major vegetation types of <br />the area (such as mountain brush) are present and available to become dominants again, should <br />conditions support that development. Thus, perhaps more important than any overall woody plant <br />• density standard is the presence of primary species as potential centers of propagation for future <br />changes in species dominance. <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />Species density data represent the total number of species present in randomly selected 100 <br />square meter areas associated with the 50m cover sample transects. Species density data from <br />the 1999 sampling are summarized in Table 14 and are graphically presented in Figure 4. In <br />1999, total species density among all reclaimed and reference areas sampled ranged between <br />26.5 and 32.0 species/ 100 mZ. The highest species densities observed were in the reclaimed <br />areas. They exceeded the reference areas in total species density by from 0.7 to 5.5 species per <br />100 sq. m. Of course, the additional opportunities for the presence of introduced annual and <br />biennial (orbs in these relatively young reclaimed areas accounted for some additional species. <br />However, even in consideration of native species only, reclaimed areas, varying from 20.0 to 20.5 <br />native species per 100 sq. m. compared favorably with reference areas which varied from 24.1 to <br />26.8 native species per 100 sq.m. Reclaimed areas tended to have more native perennial grass <br />species and fewer native perennial forbs species than the reference areas. <br />Relative cover by lifeform is summarized in Table 15 and graphically presented in Figure 5. Data <br />on which this graph is based are presented in Tables 1, 4, 7, 9, and 11. As can be seen in Figure <br />5, the reclaimed areas are much more strongly dominated by herbaceous species, especially <br />native perennial cool season grasses than the reference areas. In the Aspen, Mountain Brush, <br />and Sagebrush/snowberry reference areas, the woody biomass supported by one or more <br />centuries' cumulative growth allows only limited growth by herbaceous species. Although the <br />herbaceous component of these native vegetation types is diverse, especially as pertains to <br />perennial forbs, the physical dominance of the woody component leaves little room for <br />• herbaceous species' growth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.