Laserfiche WebLink
-` <br />Petter O'Conner - King Coal - 2 - March 6, 1987 <br />of the field observations submitted by the permitters' consultant indicate <br />that, in some areas, the ditch is heavily overgrown. It is assumed that this <br />overgrowth, where it occurs, may inhibit observation of the Ditch. Due to the <br />highly qualitative nature of the quarterly field observations, the Division <br />feels that the submittal of field survey data would be beneficial in <br />determining if subsidence processes have occurred above the King Coal Mine in <br />the vicinity of the Huntington Ditch. <br />Depending upon the results of the field surveys, modifications to the approved <br />plan (reduction or addition) may be proposed by the Division. <br />During the permit renewal process, National King Coal, Inc., submitted a "Mine <br />Plan View" map dated September 26, 1986. This map suggests that mining may <br />occur beneath Pine Gulch in portions of mining Sections Numbers 4 East, 5 East <br />and 6 East. This potential mining activity below Pine Gulch again raises the <br />concern that the gulch may be adversely affected by subsidence processes. <br />To address the Divisions concerns, the operator should respond the following: <br />(1) Does National King Coal, Inc., plan to, or propose to, extract coal from <br />beneath Pine Gulch? If no coal extraction is planned or proposed, "Mine <br />Plan View", (Drawing X-002) should be revised to indicate areas of <br />proposed coal extraction; <br />(2) If mining will take place beneath Pine Gulch, the operator should: <br />(a) Address the stream characteristics (ephemeral, perennial, or use for <br />irrigation water transport). <br />{b) Determine if the water is adjudicated; for what purposes, and in <br />what quantities. <br />(c) Investigate the potential magnitude of the surface expression of <br />subsidence when it occurs in this area, given the minimal amount of <br />overburden; <br />(d) Based upon the expected magnitude of surface disruption, the <br />operator should propose a quantitative subsidence monitoring <br />program; and <br />(e) The operator should propose mitigative measures to be undertaken, <br />and alternative sources of water, if appropriate. <br />To summarize, National King Coal, Inc., has obtained quantitative and <br />qualitative subsidence data near the Huntington Ditch. Although the <br />qualitative data has been submitted to the Division, an assessment of <br />subsidence processes at the surface cannot be made until the field survey data <br />is submitted to the Division. When that assessment is made, a recommendation <br />to terminate or otherwise modify the monitoring program may be made by the <br />Division. <br />