Laserfiche WebLink
.. ~1 Qr_ <br />~ - :.' <br /> ~ <br /> } <br /> -, ~ - Mr.. Charles L.-~ Jackson; ~, ~ ^- <br />2 - March 22, 1985 *.- <br /> -~ - _ •- _ <br />.. ~ Y'., ~ ... '~ R.. .. .. _ .. <br />;. - -'' 3: :: Page 3, Are~.3 references "Dismantle, close portal" with a reclamation. <br /> <br />t~ <br />-, cost of ;10,000.00:. Please provide more information on how this value was <br />_ <br />- - determined. <br />~~- <br />- <br /> . _ _ <br />. <br />4,- Page 4,~Area 9 references "Flood Control" with a reclamation cost of <br />'4. <br />_ <br />S ••- ;200,000.00: Please give more detailed information as to how this value was <br />'; <br />;: ,. - .: obtained. _ ` <br /> :. ~ <br />€~ <br />~~.~ .. .: .r 5... Page 4,- Area 9;references "Revegetation Peri. Road" with a cost per acre - .4~: <br /> <br />{~ <br />; ' of";700.00:' Page 2.bf"this attachment referenced reclamation costs of <br />'. ~ <br />~ ' <br />. <br />~` <br />~_ . <br />.. <br />-_~ '-•. ;1,045.00 per .acre. Please specify why a lower amount is required in this - T <br />L. ; area. - <br /> _ B, General Concerns - I_ <br />' _ 1,: Please provide more detailed breakdown as to how the "Grading & site -- <br />` . ~ preperation" was derived at the various sites where this activity must occur. _ <br />~.: ~, <br />' ~ ~'--: 3 <br /> II. Annual Report ~ _ _ _ <br /> The report as presented gives .a good review of the site; however, we believe , <br /> -more information is needed to accurately determine the activities that have • <br /> <br />_ .occurred and are proposed to occur. Providing this additional information :. _ <br />_ <br />L. ~ _ <br />would reduce speculation and inaccuracy. <br /> The Division is aware that the magnitude of .t he Henderson Mine does not lend <br /> _,. itself to easily being brokem into the categories specified for an annual ~ _ - <br />- report as outlined under Rule 2.4 of the Rules and Regulations. However, in <br /> the same regard, the magnitude of this project dictates that enough ; <br /> information be provided to clearly reflect conditions so we are able to - <br />- ~ _~ <br />F'~` .. accurately report what has and will occur to the MLRB and the public. Thus, .. _. <br /> <br />~.- we request the following items being addressed (which would be in addition to _ <br />.• ' <br /> the information already submitted). ~ •. _ <br /> <br />;,•_'"r _ A, A compilation of the number of acres affected up-to 1984, acres affected "~. <br /> during 1984; and acres to be (or proposed to be) affected in 1985. This could <br /> easily be portrayed on a table and each year revised to reflect current <br />' situations. Having this information on a single table would greatly reduce :1 <br />°x~ .,_ the time the Division currently spends compulating the information provided in ~ <br /> - pages i-6 of the attachment. - <br /> ' B. A compilation of the number of acres reclaimed up to 1984, acres reclaimed .. ~, <br /> in 1984, and acres proposed to be reclaimed in 1985. This could be placed on <br /> the same table discussed under item A above. <br /> ~ <br />:#~; C: Along with the above table, a short narrative of the location of each area.. <br />°~ • <br />- affected or reclaimed would be needed. ~- ~ <br />"` - D, The bottom of Page 2, discusses definitive measurements of the Soil - .. ,_ <br /> " .Tailing Test Plot would be made in the future. Due to the impact these <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br />` <br />~ , <br />findings have in relation to the approved reclamation plan; the Division , <br />-, <br /> believes it is important to acquire this definitive measurement information. ~ n <br /> '-- :== When will this definitive measurement occur?"~~~ '. _. ;z <br /> .~, - <br />;. <br />" _Qi.fj'~: ~ ~ Z...'..~~ <br />~ <br />~ , <br />d <br /> •i <br />.U ~ <br />1 <br />4~ $yn~'t~4[21''~' -~ <br />~~1~. ~s ~e.1.y <br />