Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. In the third paragraph on Page 15~, reference is made to "Monitor Site SW-N10T'. <br />This site, though identified on Map "Exhibit 7-1", is not listed in either Table 15-7 <br />on Page 15-21 or in the Table 1 of the 1995 AHR. Please update the permit/AHR <br />to reflect the status of obtaining data from this monitoring point. <br />6. In the first paragraph on Page 15-5, the permit discusses NPDES discharge points <br />001, 002, 004, 005, 006 and 007. In Table 15-7 of the permit (Page 15-20) and in <br />Table 1 of the 1995 AHR, NPDES discharge point 003 is listed. The current NPDES <br />Permit still lists outfal1003, therefore, should this additional point be included in the <br />permit text on Page 15-5? <br />7. On Page 15-9 of the permit, it is stated 'Peabody is requesting a variance from <br />further analysis of chromium and silver in ground and surface water samples ...". <br />This portion of the permit text should be updated to reflect the status of this <br />variance. <br />8. On Page 15-10 of the permit, a portion of the first paragraph reads 'The monitor <br />well network consists of 35 monitor wells drilled and installed by Peabody. Fifteen <br />of the wells are located at Nucla mine and 19 are at Nucla East mining area." This <br />sum equals 34. Please correct the portion of the permit that is in error. <br />9. The first paragraph on Pages 15-10 of the permit contains a sentence that states, in <br />part, "Fifteen of the wells are located at Nucla mine ..:'. However, on Page 15-19 <br />of the permit, a sentence in the second paragraph states, "twelve groundwater wells <br />will be monitored in New Horizon 1 mine area". On Page 6 of the 1995 AHR, a <br />sentence in the first paragraph reads "the total number of groundwater monitoring <br />locations at New Horizon 1 is fourteen". Finally, Appendix A of the AHR reported <br />data from sixteen wells in the Mine 1 area. The correct number of wells being <br />monitored at New Horizon 1 needs to be reflected consistently throughout the permit <br />and in the AHR. <br />10. The first paragraph on Page 15-10 of the permit contains another sentence that <br />states, in part, "...19 (wells) are at the Nucla East mining area". However, on Page <br />15-21 of the permit, Table 15-7 indicates eleven wells being monitored at New <br />Horizon 2. On Page 9 of the 1995 AHR, a sentence in the first paragraph reads <br />'There aze 14 (groundwater monitoring) sites at New Horizon 2". Finally, Appendix <br />A of the AHR reported data from 10 wells in the Mine 2 area. The correct number <br />of wells being monitored at New Horizon 2 needs to be reflected throughout the <br />permit and in the AHR. <br />11. Table 15-5 (permit Page 15-11) should be revised to reflect which wells are currently <br />active and the date other wells were deleted from the monitoring program. <br />