My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP02632
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP02632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:33:23 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:17:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/26/1996
Doc Name
1995 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT REVIEW SENECA II MINE C-80-005
From
DMG
To
SENECA COAL CO
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />5. Well depths were not included in the data tables for SSP59- <br />SSP64. Please add this information to the tables in future <br />reporting. <br />Monitoring Freguency <br />The operator has done an excellent job of meeting the required <br />frequency of site visits and taking the required number of water <br />samples. Samples were analyzed for the proper constituents as per <br />the approved plan. <br />Water Ouantitv and Oualitv <br />Spoil Wells <br />1. It is stated in the AHR text that spoil wells 59-61 <br />experienced water level increases due to the regrading of <br />topsoil in this area. Please provide a more detailed <br />explanation of what is meant by this statement. <br />Bedrock Wells <br />1. GW-S2-U monitors a fly ash disposal pit, yet only water <br />level is monitored at this well. What is the rationale <br />for monitoring water level only at this well? <br />2. Well GW-S2I-LWI also monitors the fly ash disposal pit. <br />However, this well is sampled but uses the short list <br />which excludes heavy metals which are included in the <br />long list. Please explain the rationale for the limited <br />sampling of this well. <br />3. In Table 7-81, the term contaminated is used in the <br />remarks column for some wells. What does contaminated <br />mean when used in this context? <br />Surface Water <br />1. How often are stream cross-sections determined and by <br />what method? <br />Summarv <br />Mining appears to have little impact currently to the Fish <br />Creek surface and alluvial water system. Grassy Creek total <br />dissolved solids content continues to be elevated as a result <br />of spoil spring discharges due to mining. However, elevated <br />salinity does not affect any current or potential use. Ground <br />water impacts are negligible and no off-site impacts are noted <br />at this time. <br />Please respond as appropriate to each item, correcting and <br />submitting information as necessary. Due to the field season <br />coming to a close in the next 60 days, the Division requests your <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.