My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01903
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:39 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999098
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
SLOPE STABILITY REPORT FOR RIVERVIEW RESOURCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />10. The safety factors are based on an assumed value for the strength of the bedrock <br />' on the site. The strength of the bedrock has no impact on the stability of the <br />mining highwalls. A failure surface will not initiate or propagate through the-~ <br />bedrock material A conservative c value of 300 psf and a friction angle of 45 <br />' degrees was selected [o represent the strength of the bedrock <br />The stability analysis and resulting factors of safety are based on assumed values for soil <br />' properties for this site. The values selected are representative of soils in this area and are <br />considered to be conservative. <br /> The following recommendations for monitoring of slope stability should be followed: <br /> 1. A visual inspection of the excavated highwalls should be done on a weekly basis <br /> for the first 6 months of mining. This inspection should consist of walking the <br />' existing ground and looking for any signs of stress cracks or other potential signs <br /> of slope failure. Some minor Bluffing of highwalls is expected on any mine site. <br /> The intent of this inspection is to locate potential major slope failures that could <br />' potentially extend back into a structure. <br /> 2. A visual inspection should be done anytime afler a major precipitation event that <br />' has saturated the ground using the same procedures. A major precipitation event <br /> would be defined as a storm that produces an intensity level reached once in 50 <br />' years on the average. <br /> 3. If a visual inspection detects signs of a potential slope failure, qualified personnel <br />' should be contacted to evaluate a recommend remediation work to stabilize the <br /> area. <br />' 4. If no visible signs of slope failure are detected within the first 6 months, then the <br />inspection period could be reduced to once per month or after every major <br />precipitation event. <br />1 W-Q <br /> <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br /> <br />1~r.-~ ~~.~Cl_ ' h <br />6~1 ~'?AJ44µAr / <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.