My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01903
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:32:39 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999098
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
SLOPE STABILITY REPORT FOR RIVERVIEW RESOURCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> COP~CLUSiONS AND RECCOMENDATIONS <br />' 1. The materials available onsite appear to be suitable for construction of the <br />proposed earth embankment <br /> . <br />' 2. The minimum safety factor calculated for the mining conditions adjacent to "O" <br />Street is 1.26 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25. Also, the critical <br /> failure surface does not intersect the existing structures. The proposed 75' <br />' setback is adequate. <br /> 3. The safety factor calculated for the mining conditions adjacent to 71s` and 83~a <br /> Ave is 1.57 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25. Also, the critical <br />' failure surface does not intersect the existing structures. The proposed 40' <br /> setback is adequate. <br />' 4. The safety factor, against sliding, calculated for the mining conditions adjacent to <br /> Cache La Poudre River is 1.57 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25. <br /> Also, the critical failure surface does not intersect the river. The proposed 100 <br /> setback is adequate. <br />' S. The minimum safety factor calculated for the mining conditions adjacent to the <br />existing private homes is 1.26 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25. <br />Also, the critical failure surface does not intersect the existing homes. The <br />' proposed 100' setback is adequate. <br />6. The minimum safety factor calculated for the mining conditions adjacent to the <br />' existing water tanks is 1.26 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25. <br />Also, the critical failure surface does not intersect the existing structures. The <br />proposed 100' setback is adequate. <br />7. The minimum safety factor calculated for [he mining conditions adjacent to the <br />existing utility lines is 1.57 which exceeds the minimum requirement of 1.25 <br />' Also, the critical failure surface does not intersect the existing structures. The <br />proposed 30' setback is adequate. <br />' 8. The safety factor calculated for [he reclaimed embankment is 1.7which exceeds <br />the minimum requirement of 1.5. <br />9. These safety factors are based on obtaining a saturated cohesion of 200 psf for the <br />soil in the embankment. Based on results of direct shear tests on s-'rn~Tar soils a <br />700 psf cohesion value was obtained. The 200 psf value was selected as a <br />' conservative value for the purposes of analysis. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.