Laserfiche WebLink
July 8, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />TCC Response <br />The levels were as follow: <br />May 30, 1990 = 342.6 <br />Sept. 7, 1990 = 387.6 <br />These data were entered under the wrong duplicate number and as such were not <br />retrieved during the report generation. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Alluvial Wells <br />1. The July sample for well 006-AW-2 is missing. Please explain this omission. <br />TCC Response <br />The "missing sample" was collected on July 17, 1990 and was mis-labeled as 008- <br />AW-2. As a result, the database did not recognize the analysis associated with this <br />sample and did not report it during the AHR generation. Please refer to the lab analysis <br />sheet from ACZ submitted with the C-81-071 AHR response showing all pertinent <br />information except for water depth, which was 8.0'. <br />MLRD Concern <br />2. Well 008-AV-1 has no readings after 4/90. Please explain this discrepancy. <br />TCC Response <br />The data were entered as comments as the probe indicated that the well was dry. As <br />the report generation does not retrieve comments for well 008-AV-1, only the date <br />and time were indicated. Subsequent data entry has alleviated the problem in terms <br />of comment reporting. <br />MLRD Concern <br />Surface Water <br />1) There are no water level readings for Site 304 for April, May, July, September. <br />Please explain this discrepancy. <br />