My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP01568
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP01568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:31:56 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 10:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
AHR REQUIREMENTS & INFORMATION PERMIT # C-81-018
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART I <br />Page ix <br />Pemtit No. CO-0000396 <br />B. MOMTORJTIG REQUIREMENTS <br />3. Acute WET Testine-Outfalls 004. 023. 024 and 026 (rnn[inued) <br />If ao pattern of toxicity is found the toxicity episode is cansiderod to be ended and routine testing is to resume. If a <br />pattern of toxicity is found, a PTI/ITE investigation is to be performed. If a pattern of toxicity is not demonstrated <br />but a significant level of erratic tonicity is found, the Division may roquiro m increased frequency of routine <br />monitoring or some other modified approach. <br />(d) PTIlI'IE <br />reasonable justifirxtian exists. A rrxprest for an exteosioo must be made in writing and received prior to the 120 clay <br />deadline. Such request must include a justification and supporting data for such an extension. <br />ypoints oC the PTVT~ investigation. The Division may extend the time frame for investigation where <br />The permittee may use the time for investigation to conduct a PTI or move directly into the TIE. A PTI consists of <br />a brief search for possible sources of WET, which might raven! causes of such toxicity and appropriate corrective <br />actions more simply and cost effectively than a formal TIE. If the PTI allows resolution of the WET incident, the <br />TIE need not necessarily be conducted. If, however, WET is cot identified or resolved during the PTI, the TIE <br />must be conducted within the allowed 120 day time fame. <br />Any permittee that is required to conduct a PTIfTIE investigation shall do so in conformance with procedures <br />identified in the following documents, or as subsequently updated: 1) Methods (or Aquatic Toxicity Identification <br />Evaluations, Phase T Toxicity Cheracteriration Procedures. EPA/600/6-91/003 Feb. 91 and 2) Methods for Aquatic <br />Toxicity Identification Evaluations. Phsse TT Tonicity Identification Procedures. EPA/600/3-88/035 Feb. 1989. <br />A third document in this series is Methods for Aquatic Tonicity Tdentification Evaluations. Phase TIT Toxicity <br />Confirmation Procodures. EPA/600/3-88/036 Feb. 1989. As indicated by the title, this procedure is intended to <br />wnfirm that the suspected toxicant is truly the toxicant. This investigation is optional. <br />Within 90 days of the determination of the toxicant or no later than 210 days after demonstration of tonicity, <br />whichever is sooner, a control program is to be developed and received by the Division. The program shall set <br />down a method and procedure for elimination of the toxicity to acceptable levels. <br />(e) Request For Relief <br />The permittee may request relief from further inveRigation and testing where the toxicant has not been determined <br />and the Division has determined suitable treatment does not appear possible. In requesting such relief, the permittee <br />shall submit material sufficient to establish the following: <br />(i) It has complied with terms and conditions of the permit compliance schedule for the PTIlI'[E investigation <br />end other eppropriste conditions as may Gave bees required by the Division; <br />(ii) During the period of the toxicity incident it has been in compliance with all other permit conditions, <br />including, in the case o(e POTW, pretreatment requirements; <br />(iii) During the period of the toxicity incident it has properly maintained and operated al] facilities and systems <br />of treatment and control; and <br />(iv) Despite the circumstances described in paragraphs (i) and (iii) above, the source and/or cause of~loxicity <br />could not be located or resolved, <br />~sDll P .AA] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.