My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE139099
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE139099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:39:53 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 8:20:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980189
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/10/1978
Doc Name
GRAVEL PITS
From
EL PASO CNTY
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. C. McCall <br />Dept. of Natural Resources 2 September 21; 1977 <br />1. Counties could submit to the Reclamation Board a master map <br />of their County showing existing gravel operations and a <br />single sheet stating location (i.e., T11S, R65W,.Sec 12, <br />NW ~), owner, operator, estimated time~of final operation, <br />simple reclamation statement such as: "will be used for <br />building site", "will slope and level pit and banks to <br />owner's approval and reseed with native grasses." <br />2. Counties should have authority to grant or deny new gravel <br />extraction permits at their regular public board meetings. <br />When a permit is~granted, a copy of location, etc., would <br />be sent to the Reclamation Board to be posted on the master <br />map and the files. <br />These simple processes would give the Reclamation Board a cvnti- <br />nuot3sly current record of all sand F, gravel pits per County, <br />both private and public as the Counties }gave to pass on their <br />own permits at public meetings. <br />I think this County control would give you the compliance and <br />policing actions with the proper built-in flexibility to make <br />your rules and regulations workable State-wide. <br />Each County would he automatically policed by the citizens, as <br />they are now. If they see something itt their County they are <br />concerned about, they cal..l their Commissioners, and the Commis- <br />sioners listen. Also, I feel t}iat the fees for permits and <br />annual renewals will help deter Counties from having more pits <br />than absolutely necessary. <br />The Reclamation Board, as a result, would then be able to con- <br />centrate more on the large strip mining operations in the State, <br />including large quarrry operations for rock, etc., without undue <br />burden of the additional paperwork for all parties involved. <br />Sincerely, <br />Mark D. Brenton <br />President <br />Colorado Association of Road <br />Supervisors and Engineers <br />MDB/rmm <br />u~ ,~,. _ <br />~ ~ • ., y <br /> <br />:~ <br />'Y <br /> <br />.., ~ ~. <br />;.:.., <br />::~ <br />~ ~`i~R <br />~:. <br />.,i'' <br />L <br />q .1f <br />`~r . <br />.`; ,,:: <br />~`'~~: <br />Ly, <br />_: , y <br />f. <br />,. ,r. <br />(~., <br />yi~+ '. <br />.\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.