My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE138305
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE138305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:38:55 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 7:32:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
RN EXHIBIT 1 TO EXHIBIT 8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i:a:er (tial.ity Control Division <br />' 4210 East 11th aye au¢ <br />• uent•er, Colorado 802?0 <br />ADDEIaU?: TO R.4TI0"]ALE <br />COLORADO 'iAMP:1 CGAL CC. <br />PERPiIT NL~dBER: CO-0027154 <br />RGUTT NL1'TY <br />The permittee submitted a letter dated January 13, 1983 info:-cing the Division <br />that the permi[tee is planning to expand ope-ations and perform underground <br />coal wining at the site. Y:ater from the underground mine would be pumped to a <br />sump. From [he sumo the water would be pumped to pond D, and *_o Foidel Creek <br />through pernitted discharge point 005. <br />Pre ser.tly, discharge point 005 has technology based, federal effluent <br />limitations (BPT} for iron and total suspended solids. These limitations were <br />placed ir. the permit because the pond was designed tc contair. runoff iron <br />surface mining activities associated with Mine !'1. Discharges of runoff fzon <br />the pond ccincidad with hiDh :..-stream flogs and it is the D'_vision's position <br />that under these citcur..stanees more stringent limitations are not required to <br />caintain instream water quality standards. <br />The proposed urderg-eund mine is e:;pected to pro~uce more water than occurred <br /> fror_ the surface mite. In addition, the drainage from the underground ^ine <br /> would occur ov er a'_1 seasons of the year, not just in response to <br />• precipitati:;n events. Based or. the projections submitted b}• the permittee, <br /> flows from t},e undergrouni mine will increase from 49 fpm in the 1st }•ear o: <br /> mining to over 1600 gpm ir. the 4th year. These rates of flow fror the nine <br /> will resLlt in a continuous or nezriy continuous discharge of water from GOS <br /> by January 1, 1984. <br />Pond D w:zich has discharge point 005 as it's outfall has a total capacity of <br />appro::imately 51 acre-f t. of water without using the emergenc}• spillwa}•. <br />Eased on the calculations of the :•II.P.D, the goad needs 23.6 acre-_[, of storage <br />*_o handle sediment. This is a censarvative figure and subject to change. <br />However, i*_ is a .equirement of ?iLRD at this moment. In addition, 6.% <br />acre-ft. of storage is required to handle runoff from the 10 year-24 hour <br />storm event. In total, 3C.3 acre-f t. of storage is needed for sediment and <br />runoff without considering the underground mine drainage. Thus, 20.i acre-f t. <br />of storage is available for underground mine drainage. <br />[;rainage from the underground trine is projected to be .19 acre-Ft.jda}• in }-ear <br />one, 3.3 acre-f t./day ir. year two and reaching i.2 acre-f t./day in year four. <br />In year two there would be appro::imateiy 6 days of storage available, in year <br />four, only 3 da}•s of storage. Currentl}• the pond is designed to discharge <br />almost continuously as water is collected. At the volumes of water projected <br />to flow :tom the mine a continuous discharge would occur. Since a continuous <br />discharge will occur instream water quality standards must be protected in the <br />permit. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.