Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />l J <br />• <br />Compaction <br />Test Report <br />cuENr. BASIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />14300 HIGHWAY 12 <br />WESTON, COLORADO 81091 <br />® CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL <br />A(`ID MATERIALS ENGINEERS <br />o, E 11/16/95 Loe No. 22905 <br />REPCmr~r~ 4 s~EEr 1of 3 _ <br />$uB1EL:r FIELDDENSfiYTESTS <br />REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br />TEST DEPTH TEST F.41X OMC DRV MC COM~ <br />NO. LOCATION FEET TYPE DENSITY DENSITY .. PACTION SOIL TYPE <br /> PCF PCF o <br /> 1 <br /> CURVE NO <br />. <br />8 <br />30 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6941 NUC 108.0 9.0 114.0 4.0 100 _ <br />_ <br />JOB N0.22905 <br /> __ _ _ _ _ CURVE NO. 8 <br />31 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6742 NUC 108.0 9.0 116.0 5.3 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> N_E_W ELK DEVELOPMENT _ _ CURVE NO. 9 <br />32 WASTE PILE 7528 NUC 91.0 11.0 97.0 7.9 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK DEVEL_OPMENf_ CURVE NO. 9 <br />33 WASTE PILE 7280 NUC 91.0 11.0 102.0 7.0 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK DEVELOPMENT __ _ CURVE NO. 9 <br />34 WASTE PILE 7278 NUC 91.0 11.0 100.0 1 1.4 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> _ _ __. CURVE NO. 10 <br />35 NEW ELK RDA 7427 NUC 96.0 10.0 95.0 8.3 99 JOB N0.22905 <br /> CURVE NO. 10 <br />36 NEW ELK RDA 7479 NUC 96.0 10.0 90.0 12.2 94 JOB N0.22905 <br /> <br />i ElEVAl10N IN FEET <br />SPECIFICATIONS:--90-- - %OF NLl IMUM _ ASTM D 69B <br />MOISTURE WITHIN _ __ °x O° OPiIp,1U~M <br />TYPE OF COMPACTION E9UIPMENi AND NO OF UNITS' <br />(2jDOZERS __ __ _ __ <br />MOISTURE ADDED BY _ . ~ _ <br />THICKNESS OF LIFT INCHES <br />TYPE OF EAf7TH MGnNG EOUIPMENi AND NO OF UNITS <br />(2jDOZERS,_(4jDUMP TRUCKS <br />THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED:S A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION <br />OF FILL P WCEM1IEM ~.5 W ELL AS THE IESiS SHOWN ABOVE V/E HAVE RELIED <br />UPON THE CONIRACIOR fO APPIV THE NECE5541JY COMPACiNE EFFORT AND <br />n,1015NRE TO ACHIEVE $PEOFIED COMPACTION DVRING IIME$ WHEN OUR <br />OdSERVFR IS NOT PRESENT. AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER iFWfJ THOSE TESTED <br />IESI DATA ARE NOi THE 501E BAS15 FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE RlL MEETS <br />SPECIFlCATIONS. <br />PROGRESS REPORT AT THE TIME OF OUR SiTE VISiT THE CONTRACTOR HAD 1 DOZER, 7 LOADER AND 2 TRUCKS <br />WORKING AT THE GOLDEN EAGLE R.D.A. THE FILL APPEARED TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION WiTH NO VISIBLE SOFT <br />OR WET AREAS. THE MOISTURE CONTENT WAS UNIFORM AND THE SURFACE HAD BEEN COMPACTED AND LEVELED BY <br />A DOZER. THE CONTRACTOR HAD EXCAVATED A SMALL SURFACE AREA AT THE NORTHEAST END OF THE FILL WHERE <br />THEY WERE PLACING FINE COAL WASTE FROM SEDIMENTATION PONDS FOR DRYING. THERE HAD BEEN NO ACTMIY <br />AT THE NEW ELK WASTE DEVELOPMENT PILE SINCE OUR LAST VISR. THE EASTERN TWO-THIRDS OF THE PILE <br />HAD BEEN LEVELED AND COMPACTED BY A DOZER AND APPEARED TO BE UNIFORM AND IN A WELL COMPACTED <br />CONDITION. (CONTINUE ON SHEET 2 OF REPORT 4j <br />^ IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEFTS SPECIFICATIONSAS INDICATED BV OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST N0151_ _ <br />^ IN OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION DOES NOi MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BV OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST N0151_ <br />AND SHOULD BE REWORKED <br />SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: ^ FULL TIME; :X PERIODIC.ON CALL BA515; 'X CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE ADVISED RALPH LOPEZ <br />(BASIM <br />PAUL WIGGS <br />FIELD REPRESENIATM1'E <br />PR:BAS <br />CTL/THOMPSON. INC. <br />avvRp,eo e/ MARK G. GRAY, P.E. <br />