My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137785
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137785
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:38:24 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 6:33:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1999 Addendum to 97/98 Landslide Corrective Measure
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 14C Appendix H
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />(I) Calculated factors of safety utilizing slope stability analysis. <br />(2) Landslide velocity classifications (LNG's) based on movement rates measured in the field. <br />Utilizing Bayes' Rule, which combines the probability of outcomes determined from these two methods, a <br />weighted average of the probabilities was determined to further refine the estimation of probability. A <br />comparison of these two sets of probabilities, along with the Bayes' Rule analysis, provides a reasonable <br />estimate of the probability of future landslide outcomes under existing conditions. <br />H7.2.1 Probability Based UpoB Factor of Safety ADalyses. <br />Probabilities where assigned to landslide outcomes based upon the factor of safety against sliding <br />determined by slope stability analysis. To simplify the analysis, the factors of safety listed in Section H4.2 <br />were rounded to the lowest 5/I OOths so that factors of safety of 1.0, 1.25, and 1.3 were assumed for the <br />1997, 1998, and 1999 conditions. <br />Mean Shear Strength. The mean shear strength of soil was assumed [o be [ha[ strength which produced a <br />factor of safety of 1.0 against sliding in the 1997 condition. In the 1997 condition, the slide was moving <br />and accelerating to rapid failure as evidenced by the landslide movement figures. in this condition, the <br />slide was azbitrarily given a 50/50 chance of rapid failure, and assigned a factor of safety of 1.0. The mean <br />strength was calculated to be a fiction angle of 12.1 and cohesion of 200 psf. <br />Coefficien! ojVariation of Shear Strength. The mean shear strength parameters were assumed to have a <br />coefficient of variation of 30 percent (Lee, White and Ingles, page 199). This is validated by Sylvester <br />Gulch Borings that indicate a coefficient of variation of 32% for the friction angle of clay. <br />Assigning factors ojsajety to landslide movements. The landslide outcomes were related to the factor of <br />safety of sliding as follows: <br />(1) rapid movement, a factor of safety of less than 1.0. <br />Barr Engineering Company <br />PCDOCSl208220/CAK <br />July 31, 1999 <br />24 Appendu H <br />1999 Addendum to <br />1997/99 Landslide Corrective Measures Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.