Laserfiche WebLink
Rule 2.05 <br />• Flow rates from RSP-4 have consistently been estimated in the 2 to 6 gpm range and also appear <br />to reflex annual snowpack conditions. Water quality is somewhat poorer than in RSP-3 with <br />post mining TDS levels ranging from about 2500 to 3400 mg/I. Like RSP-3, dominant <br />constituents are sulfate, calcium, sodium and bicarbonate, but with proportionately considerably <br />higher sodium and magnesium levels. The pH is somewhat lower than in RSP-3, but apparently <br />stable, with a range of 6.6 to 7.8. No easily discernible trends in water quality have been <br />observed. Somewhat elevated levels of iron, aluminum and manganese were reported for <br />samples taken in 1988 and 1989, but there do not appear to be any increasing trends for these <br />parameters. <br />Other spoil springs have been sampled when they produced sufficient flow to allow sample <br />collection but have only been analyzed for the field parameters of pH, conductivity, and <br />temperature. Flows of the seeps/springs have also been estimated during the annual seep and <br />spring inventories. Flows in RSP-1 and RSP-2 have been consistently estimated at less than 1 <br />or 2 gpm. RSP-5 and RSP-6 have been essentially dry since reclamation was completed in 1987. <br />Water quality in the two wells regularly sampled, HGl and HG2, has not shown any <br />significant changes since monitoring in these wells began in 1987. Both wells were completed <br />as replacement monitor wells in response to MLRD concerns about the adequacy of previous <br />monitor wells, az described in Section 4.05.13, Surface and Ground Water Monitoring. <br />Evaluation of water quality data from 1994 well samplings indicate no significant changes from <br />previous years or problems with water quality parameters. Both wells indicate generally good <br />but "hard" water quality. TDS levels in HGl have varied from 656 to 976 mg/l with a mean <br />• value of 814 mg/1. TDS levels in HG2 are slightly higher with a range of 732 to 1064 mg/1 and <br />a mean of 947 mg/I. The pH values are also very stmtlar, and consistent, for the two wells with <br />respective ranges for HG-1 of 6.9 to 8.0 and ranges of 6.2 to 8.0 for HG2. Primary TDS <br />constituents in both wells are sulfate, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium and sodium. No obvious <br />water quality trends are evident in either well. <br />The only concern with heavy metals and trace constituents has been occasional high iron levels <br />in well HG2. It is suspected that elevated iron levels may be associated with some type of iron <br />bacteria although the source could also be a an oxidation/reduction contact in or near the well. <br />Initial water production from the well during sampling is sometimes very discolored with iron <br />staining but prolonged well purging prior to sample collection has been successful in clearing <br />the water and substantially elimina[ing discoloration. The relatively rapid clearing of water <br />pumped from the well suggests that the high iron occurrences are very localized and confined <br />to either the well bore or immediate well vicinity. <br />Water levels within the coal zone aquifer have shown considerable fluctuations since completion <br />of reclamation, az indicated by well HG2. Water levels steadily declined about 20 feet from <br />June 1988 through September 1990, then rebounded sharply in June 1991. From August 1993 <br />through the 1994 readings, a steady decrease in water levels has been observed. The magnitude <br />and relative speed with which water levels change in HG-2 suggest that the water table (from <br />approximately SO to 100 deep) is fairly responsive to seasonal ground water recharge events. In <br />comparison, water levels in well HGl have shown relatively minor fluctuations but an overall <br />pattern similar to HG2. <br />Well UC-1, which waz repor[edly completed in the upper coal zone and is monitored for water <br />level only, has shown essentially no change in water levels from 1987 through 1994. <br />H \eJJ\PERMn\RULEI-0S.HG <br />11/1N9s I.JOpm wrsv~m~ 2,05-16 Revised - 11/28/95 <br />