Laserfiche WebLink
Rule 1.05 <br />Previous findings by the MLRD in conjunction with mine permit renewals confirmed operator <br />compliance with the requirements of Rules 2.04.11, 2.05.6(2) and 4.18 regarding protection of <br />fish and wildlife resources. <br />2.05.8131 Protection of flydrologie Belenee <br />The surface water quantity and quality portions of the initial permit application can be found <br />in Section 2.04.7 (Volume IJ, Appendix I (Volume IVJ, Appendix L (Volume VJ and Appendix S <br />(Volume VIIIJ. Appendix E, Volume /11 contains the original sediment control plan developed <br />by M-K. Surface water quality data for the smaller drainages are given in Exhibit AA and CC <br />of the volume entitled Exhibit II. The original NPDES permit and baseline monitoring plan are <br />compiled in Appendix K (Volume IVJ. The original surface water monitoring plan was described <br />in Section 2.05.6(3J. Section 2.05.6(3J(bJ(IOJ, Protection of the Hydrologic Balance, was revised and <br />updated by HGCC as part of the 1986 permit renewal process, and submitted to the MLRD in <br />November 1986. The current surface and groundwater monitoring programs are described in <br />Section 4,05.13 of [his document. Results of the monitor well, spring and surface water <br />sampling program are presented in Annual Reclamation Reports. For convenient reference, <br />copies of the Annual Reports for 1990 [hrough 1994 area provided in Appendix E. These <br />reports include water monitoring data from 1987 forward. <br />Surface Water <br />Regular monitoring of surface water quality in Hayden Gulch since final reclamation was <br />completed (1987) has not indicated any signifiant changes in water quality. TDS levels at [he <br />• Upper Hayden Gulch site have varied from about 540 [0 850 mg/I with no apparent trend. The <br />pH has remained essentially constant in the 8.0 to 8.5 range. Heavy metals and trace constituent <br />levels do not appear to present any problems. TSS has varied from 2 to 104 mg/l with no <br />readily apparent correlation between TSS values and tlow rates. Estimated flow values Rave <br />ranged between 0 (no flow) and 1.0 cfs, in apparent response to yearly snowpack and seasonal <br />precipitation conditions. <br />Water flows in Lower Hayden Gulch appear to have increased over pre-mine levels as flows at <br />this site are now perennial and were ephemera] prior to mining. Estimated flow rates range <br />from 0.01 cfs to 1.0 cfs, with some apparent response to snowmelt and rainfall conditions. TDS <br />levels have varied from 646 to 2748 over a nine year monitoring period, with the predominant <br />constituents being sulfate, sodium, calcium and bicarbonate. The pH has remained fairly <br />constant with a range of 7.5 to 8.5. As with the Upper Hayden Gulch samples, TSS <br />concentrations have varied substantially; from less than 1.0 mg/1 to 310 mg/1, with no apparent <br />correlation to flow although the higher values were usually observed in the Fall. Heavy metals <br />and trace constituent levels appear to be acceptable. No obvious [rends or significant changes <br />in water qu~ity have been observed. <br />Groundwater <br />Spoil springs RSP-3 and RSP-4, shown on Map 3, Environmental Monitoring and Sampling Sites, <br />have been sampled every spring since 1987 and 1985, respectively. Flow rates are estima[ed from <br />visual observation and samples are analyzed for an extensive suite of parameters. TDS <br />concentrations in RSP-3 have ranged from 610 to 1004 with sulfate, alcium, bicarbonate and <br />sodium the predominant constituents. The pH has remained steady, ranging from 7.0 to 7.6 <br />(field values). Estimated flows have varied from less than 1 to 6 gpm. Data evaluation suggests <br />that water quality has no[ changed significantly since monitoring began and that flow rates are <br />largely a function of snowpack depth and the speed of spring snow melt. <br />H:\Bl1\PERM n\RULE3~05. HG <br />11/36/95 3:)Opm mP51/cm< 2.05-15 Revised - 11/28/95 <br />