My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE137225
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE137225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:37:53 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 5:43:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
X198816822
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/23/1988
Doc Name
NOI Application
From
PEABODY
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PROJECT METHODS <br />The procedures employed for this project are separated into two categories. The first <br />category deals with previous work documented in the survey area; the second explains <br />the methods used Burin; the field survey. <br />LITERATURE SEARCH AND RECORDS CHECK <br />An intensive files search was carried out at the Office of the State Archaeologist of <br />Colorado (OSAC) and the Office of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) on <br />August 21 and ~2, 1979. A search of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Little Snake <br />Resource Area tiles was carried out by Resource Area Archaeologist Sherri Hanson and <br />her report was made to 1VCRll4 on August 27, 1979. The SHPO search indicated no sites <br />were on the National Register; the BLM and OSAC files produced identical inventories of <br />previously documented cultural resources. Findings resulting from the literature search <br />and records check are presented in the discussion of previous research. <br />• FIELD M11ETIlODS <br />The entire oroject area received a 1009; pedestrian survey coverage. Differences in field <br />crew spacing and survey techniques were dictated by topography and the likelihood of the <br />presence of sites. Tops of ridges were surveyed by parallel zigzag transects spaced 5 m <br />to 20 m apart by two- to four-man crews. In heavily vegetated areas, the spacing of <br />transects depended upon the presence of game trails, as thickets were virtually <br />impenetrable without such trails. In some cases, transects were partially completed on <br />hands and knees. <br />Alluvial bottoms, fans, benches, and brush flats were transected in a similar fashion, <br />usually without the problems of scrub oak thickets. Steep slopes were surveyed with <br />wider spacing (up to 35 m apart) since the probability of a site existing there is low. All <br />cutbanks, arroyos, exposed surfaces, rodent backdirt and anthills were given close <br />attention by the archaeologists in order to ascertain whether buried sites were present. <br />Aspen groves and lone stands of timber were closely inspected for historic carvings. <br />Exposed rock was surveyed intensively for rock art and rock shelters. <br />• <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.