Laserfiche WebLink
~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 D I v 15 l O N O F <br />Phune: (3031 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX: (303) A32-8106 & <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />January 4,2001 MI NING•SAFETY <br />BJI Owens <br />Goaernar <br />Greg E Watcher <br />Evecunve Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />Ms Gloria Brown <br />23000 Highway 50 <br />Monarch CO 81227 <br />Re: Comments, Monarch Quarry 112 Permit Application, File No. ~$ <br />Dear Ms. Brown: <br />The Division received your list of comments on December 19, 2000. They have been reviewed <br />and the Division will respond in detail to the concerns that aze applicable to the permitting <br />process. <br />First, let me explain what Colorado Lime Company (CLC) proposes to do. As you are awaze, <br />CLC applied for four 110 Limited Impact permits in 1996. Each permit covered approximately <br />9.8 acres. One of the permit applications was withdrawn and the other three were approved, and <br />permits issued, in 1998. The 110 permits were approved for three different activities. One <br />covered the removal of a portion of the limestone waste dump, one covered quarrying activities <br />at a limestone deposit and one covered quarrying activities at a dolomite deposit. Except for the <br />waste dump activity, CLC does not propose to significantly alter their mining plan for the <br />limestone and dolomite. CLC does propose to remove most of the waste limestone along the <br />South Arkansas River. CLC does not propose to create any disturbances on the north side of [he <br />South Arkansas River even though they propose to locate the north permit boundary on the south <br />side of Highway 50 (north of the river). <br />CLC and the Division aze aware that your property is located close to the proposed mining <br />operation. The Division is also aware that your house is quite old and needs to be protected. The <br />Division will provide as much protection for the structure as is legally possible under the <br />provisions of the Construction Materials Act and the Minerals Rules and Regulations. As you <br />recall, in the approved dolomite permit (M-1996-071), CLC was required to minimize ground <br />motion peak particle velocities (by keeping the amount of explosives per shot to a minimum), to <br />adequately stem [he blast holes to prevent fly rock, to conduct pre-blast surveys (with your <br />permission, of course) in order to evaluate potential and actual damage to your structure and to <br />monitor each blast to ensure compliance with maximum allowed permit standards (1 inch per <br />