My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE135428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE135428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:36:09 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 3:27:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/19/2003
Doc Name
pages 2.05-59 through 2.05-116
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I . 2.05.6 <br />If continuous mine discharge occurs from either the B-Seam or D-Seam, the <br />operator will construct a pipeline from the mine portals to convey mine wafer <br />to D Gulch, outfall 006. The mine water will be treated in underground <br />sumps so no outside settling ponds will be required. D Gulch is a well <br />defined ephemeral channel. D Gulch is intercepted by ditch D-H1 south of <br />SH 1336 as shown on Map 21-3. Flow from Ditch D-H1 runs under the <br />railroad tracks in culvert C-H1. Flow from Culvert C-H1 travels along a <br />highway borrow ditch north of SH-133, through a highway culvert and into the <br />North Fork of the Gunnison River. The Deer Tail Ditch is piped under D- <br />Gulch and there is an undershot in D Gulch for the Fire Mountain Canal. <br />Therefore, no structures are required to keep mine water out on the irrigation <br />structures. Furthermore, D Gulch's well defined ephemeral channel, and the <br />design ditches and culverts will assure the mine water has no impact on <br />water users or the alluvial valley floor after if leaves the mine property but <br />before it enters the North Fork of the Gunnison River. The mine water will <br />be contained in the D Gulch channel and design ditches and culverts so it <br />will not effect or come in contact with irrigation water for adjacent lands. <br />• <br />Leachate from the proposed refuse and coal stockpile could also degrade <br />the water quality of the river. The proposed refuse and coal pile will <br />encompass 5.5 and 4.9 acres at full capacity respectively. Based on the <br />geochemical analysis presented in Volume III, Exhibit 6, the average <br />conductivity of the roof, interburden and floor samples is 4,263 and coal is <br />810 umhos/cm. According to Section 2.04.8 the average annual rainfall in <br />the area is 18.5 inches. If all of this rainfall percolated through the piles <br />during the year, the equivalent flow would be 10 gallons per minute. In its <br />Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Study for the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />dated September 25, 1992, the DMG assumed infiltration through a refuse <br />pile is the result of snowmelt and it was estimated 2.8 inches per year would <br />infiltrate during a n0 day period. The equivalent flow for this assumption over <br />the 10.4 acre piles is 9 gallons per minute over the 60 day period. The two <br />different leachate production estimates produce similar equivalent flow <br />values. However, based on the estimated equivalent flow figures, leachate <br />production and associated potential degradation is insignificant compared to <br />the potential degradation from mine water discharge. <br />Alluvial wells AW-1 through AW-6 were installed to monitor groundwater <br />contamination. AW-1, AW-2 and AW-3 are near the coal stockpile and AW- <br />4, AW-5 and AW-6 are near the gob pile. The water quality in the wells is <br />TR-026 2.05 - 74 - 9/18/03 <br />APPRavEo <br />9/l9fo3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.