Laserfiche WebLink
4 ~ ~ • <br /> <br />Page 19 <br />the public was allowed the same amount of time to provide comments and objections as it <br />did for the original application. <br />ISSUES RA/SED DUR/NG THE INIT/AL COMMENT PERIOD THAT THE DIVISION <br />BELIEVES ARE NOT WITH/N THE JUR/SDICT/ON OF THE DIVISION OR BOARD <br />"Safety hazard of being a collectorhighway (U.S. Highway 50); trucks on County Road 157 <br />and the highway." <br />"Changes the basic character and use of land at Pazkdale." <br />"County Planning and Zoning Board, by approving the operation, failed to protect the utility <br />and value and future of the land at Pazkdale." <br />4. "Adverse impacts on air quality." <br />"The maps are misleading in the designation of nearby buildings as ranch houses, when they <br />are really buildings associated with the D & RG and some historic significance." <br />6. "The location is incompatible to non-motorized traffic on the river and would cause year- <br />round serious traffic congestion on the highway." <br />"The mining operation would cost Fremont County more to monitor various needs than it <br />could ever bring benefit." <br />8. "Aggregate mine's non-compliancewithe the Fremont County's master plan for preserving <br />scenic Highway 50 -Arkansas River Corridor." <br />"Possible affects of the proposed project on recreation and tourism industries are not <br />addressed." <br />10. "The proposed project should give some consideration to the effects of the mine on visual <br />resources." <br />11. "Blasting, crushing, screening and loading will create a sever noise problem affecting the <br />experience of area visitors'. <br />12 "It is premature to place complete reliance on the transportation of the product almost <br />entirely upon a potentially unavailable rail service." <br />13. "The hours of operation." <br />