Laserfiche WebLink
<br />z. <br />"• On the other hand, Sour other samnlrs also gave datr.:3 0l' Plorinrn. I have <br />loo}~d at the unused portions oS tuo of these samples, and they both ar•ra <br />comprised of very nice charcoal with no evidencr. of rootlets of any kind, <br />I have no technical reason for doubting the validity of these results. <br />In regard to the txo older samples, again I have no techni.ca]. reason to <br />doubt the results. I gather that the SHPO thinks the date are too old. <br />Perhaps, the xood from which the charcoal was derivrd xas from a very old <br />.. tree. i' <br />I'm sorry that I can't give you more encouragnrtJent as to reasons for your <br /> problem. I do have sufficient good material for RIr ll~32 anci RIB ll,35 <br /> so that I could rerun these samples with am pretreatment wr, would decide <br /> on, but I really don't think the re sults wot~].d differ sipnifi.cantly from <br /> xhat we already have. <br /> If you h ave any further questions, do not hesi.tat~e to write or call. i <br /> hope my comments will be of help to you. <br /> 5lncerely, <br /> 7 <br /> ` <br />' i Charles v. 'fucek <br />'• <br />.: r ,,:' <br /> <br /> <br />4 ~'1 l : "'~ I ]' 1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />• <br />