My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134108
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:48 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/6/2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 51 Lower Refuse Pile
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mountain Coal Company, L.L.C. Exhibit 57 <br />West Elk Mine Lower Refuse Pile <br />multiple flow events, typically ranging in thickness from 1 to 3 feet. Individual events are often marked by <br />• multiple organic horizons. Materials within the fan are highly stratified and somewhat variable ranging <br />from relatively coarse. clean sand and gravel to silty or sandy clay. However, the predominant material <br />present within the fan. particularly in the toe area of the pile, appears to consist of a silty sand and gravel <br />material with abundant boulder and cobble-sized fragments of sandstone. <br />The back (southwest) portion of the pile lies above colluvial materials associated with the steeper slopes in <br />the area. Although still somewhat variable in character, a typically hieher percentage of silt and clay-sized <br />fines are present in the sand and gravel materials. Also, zones of nested cobbles or boulders are common. <br />Some distance to the north of [he pile ,the geological environment begins to chanee as you move down the <br />terraces to the relatively clean eravel. cobble. and boulder alluvium terraces in the transitional environment. <br />It is anticipated that an inte~neering of the debris flow materials and the coarse, somewhat cleaner <br />alluvium would be present, resulting in a "hybrid" material having intermediatecharacteristics. <br />The largest single even[ observed in the test pits had a maximum thickness of three fee[. This would <br />indicate that the fans present were most likely constructed by many small events and were not the result of a <br />few large events. Despite this and the evidence of long inactivity on the fan, it is assumed that it is possible <br />during the life of the pile for another debris flow even[ to occur, blocking the existine drainage within <br />Sylvester Gulch. The reconstruction of Sylvester Gulch Road (see Section 7.1) in the area provides for a <br />drainage channel sufficient to convey the 100-year flood event safely past the pile. even in the event that the <br />natural channel now existing in Sylvester Gulch is fully blocked by debris along its full lenb~th adjacent to <br />the pile. The relocated Sylvester Gulch Road provides a buffer between any flooding or debris flow events <br />associated with SylvesterGulch and the waste pile construction. <br />Past evidence indicates that the majority of debris flow activity in Sylvester Gulch has ceased, or at least <br />E <br />remained inactive for a long period of time. Further, the evidence indicates that the magnitude of such <br />events is small and that the provisions made for these events in the design should be adequate to prevent <br />loss of refuse into the gulch for storm events up to the 100-year event. However, it is not possible to <br />quantify the probability of such a debris flow event occurring within Sylvester Gulch since, unlike <br />hydrologic events, a succession of debris flow events are not statistically independent. The movement and <br />redistribution of loose material or debris during an event has an effect on the probability associated with <br />subsequent events. The quantitative information available on the likelihood and the character of future <br />debris flow events in SylvesterGulch represents the best information available. <br />5.~ Subsurface Hydrology <br />5.x.1 Permeability Data <br />In-situ falling head permeability tests were performed in one piezometer and all of the monitoring wells. <br />Measured values of horizontal permeability were found to range from ?.~ x 10~ cm/second to 3.6 x 105 <br />cm/second (see Table 6). These values represent horizontal permeability values and in the highly stratified <br />soils observed at the site, vertical permeability is expected to be even lower by at least one order of <br />magnitude. Previous investigators have reported the permeabiliryof the waste material to be approximately <br />I.'_ x 10~ cm/second. This permeability contrast of more than one order of magnitude will cause most of <br />the leachate water to perch within the waste and above native soils. Using conservative estimates of <br />infiltration (to be discussed in the following section), it is estimated that the maximum height of mound <br />development within the pile will be approximately''7 feet. The water will migrate laterally and ultimately <br />be intercepted in a system of underdrains where it will be routed to the existing sedimentation ponds. <br />~,.. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.