My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE134031
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE134031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:44 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:50:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1989065
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/16/1989
Doc Name
WINKLER LIGHT AGGREGATE QUARRY PN M-89-065
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE RINDAHL INC
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~..-_ <br />TUTTLE APPLEGATE RINDAHL, INC. <br />Consultants for Land and Resource Development <br />Mr. Michael Boyd <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />August 16, 1989 <br />Page 5 <br />It appears the maximum overburden liability is going to'.A~~,~vf <br />occur in the first year where we do not have a final place ~~F~„~~ <br />to put the material. We have mentioned we will have a totals ~yi+s' <br />of 16 acres of mining in the crushed and cut stone <br />operations. Assuming a six foot depth, this 16 acres will , <br />produce 154,880 cubic yards of material. Under major <br />disturbance on Page L-2, we have already accounted for <br />81,877 cubic yards of overburden and topsoil. Therefore, we <br />have an additional 73,003 cubic yards of material to <br />possibly handle. <br />I have included this cost into the figures on Page L-2. The <br />increased bonds have also been noted in the summary on Page <br />L-1. Our total proposed bond now is $273,000. After the <br />initial years have passed and the operator is recycling the <br />stripings, we may request a partial release of the bond in <br />the amount of $73,003. <br />2. On Pages L-2 and L-3 we have included costs for mobilization Sa'~~,^ <br />and demobilization. In addition, on Page L-3, we have \°,~ <br />included an amount for the demolition and removal of ~`'~ <br />valueless buildings. If the bond was forfeited, we would5i~ta~ x\ <br />assume the operator would remove any buildings and equipment U^~, <br />of value. There may be some incidental buildings and some ~,~o~~°~ <br />equipment left on the site of no value which would have to °,~1~ i <br />be removed. If indeed the operator left the working ~" \i :. 1 <br />equipment on the site, the Division could take title of the ? .ti\,,'' <br />equipment and then sell it at auction. No doubt thea,,,~G~,1+ <br />Division could make a substantial sum of money to cover the.,-f'~t. <br />entire reclamation on the proceeds of any auction. Also Y 5~,,,b>''~ <br />please note on Page L-3 we have included 15~ of indirect ~ <br />costs which we assume would cover such items as <br />administration and removal of valueless building and <br />equipment. <br />As enclosures with this letter we have included Page L-1 <br />through L-4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.