PERMFILE133830 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r-aeB and a rov c~ ~ ~ ~ maa " "~ '°~«r~M~ a ' Pp ed reclamatior tan untnoe„ a ~ ' change is mutui~y agreed upon 6y the lan~ner and the Operator. ~ b. See paragraph 13. a. 14. a. Costs for reclamation include costs far all areas. Seeding, mulching, and fertilizing cannot 5e accomplished in "major" or "moderate" disturbed areas. Roads constructed as a result of the mining operation will be reclaimed the same as other disturbed areas. b. The reclamation tests are on a "by area" basis and apply to each area. if each area were to be mined as a separate entity and bonded separately, the cost to reclaim ,could 6e approximately. Area 1 311,900 Area 2 5,100 Area 3 ?2,100 Area 4 5,500 These costs are worst case costs. The total of these area tests would not apply since the areas will not be disturbed at the same time. c. The 54 acre figure is correct. The individual asking the question apparently did not understand that areas will 6e in different stages of reclamation and are not additive as far as total area is concerned. d. The a>;plcratior. is r.ot included as a part of the reclama- tion permit. the operator has agreed to remove the rebars. 15. The condition of the lease is a matter between the landowner and the operator. The intention. of this hearing procedure, in the opinion of the operator, is to force the operator into a positicn where he would agree to a new lease. The operator will attempt to negotiate a nee-a lease, but until that is accomplished, the operator considers the existing lease valid and ir. force. 16. hated. 17. The operator feels that a hearing is not necessary in that all items contained in the staff adequacy letter have been properly addres=_ed. TF.e matter of a new lease should be resolved between the landowner and the operator and is not a matter which should 6e presented to the Mined Land. Feclamation board far resolution by that body. b Enaineer~nn & Environmental Services ~~~~.~.~