My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133715
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:23 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:30:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/6/1989
Doc Name
Letter of protest
From
Michael A. Gomez
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a great amount of dust. This will affect air puallty for the mammals and <br />birds, as well as increase the siltation of the stream. Battle Mountain <br />also plans to relocate some roads closer to the steam. This action will <br />surely increase the siltation into the Rito Seco. The erosion pa;_terns in <br />this area are very significant at this time, with the sparse vegetation <br />maintaining a fragile hold on the powdery topsoi I. Any further disruption <br />of the area will increase the chances for erosion, which are already <br />evident in the numerous gullies along the strearti. This wlll affErct the - <br />water quality of the Rito Seco and could have a negative effect .in the ~- -". <br />.aquatic life of the stream, specifically but not limited to the fish species.-<---,; r .- <br />. Battle Mountain states that no endangered species of mammals or fish _ .: __=- _. <br />inhabit the Rito Seco area, but I would like to assure them that .all _ <br />wildlife is precious and their habitats must be protected for everyone so <br />that this generation and those to come will be able to enjoy wil~jlife in a - <br />natural setting. <br />My third concern is the serious threat to the wildlife of the Ftito Seco <br />area 1n regards to the use of cyanide in open, water filled pads. This may <br />be acost-effective process for gold removal, but I feel that projecting <br />our environment, wildlife, and the Rito Seco stream ecology is of more _ . <br />immediate importance than "cost-effective mining". <br />Water is the most basic need of ail life. Cyanide poisoning i~ a real <br />and ominous danger to the whole environment. How does the company plan <br />to control the wildlife from using the pads for drinking water? This <br />includes birds of all species that may use the area. <br />In reviewing the Battle Mountain plan, I do not feel confident that the <br />leach pads are protected from dumping their contents into the R to Seco <br />Creek, possibly causing a major kill of fish and all aquatic life. ,any spill <br />from the leach pads caused by an unforeseen rain could result in the total <br />destruction of the ecology of the Rito Seco. Placing the leach pad <br />facilities in the flood plain only invites catastrophe. What plan; are in <br />place to protect the environment in regards to the handling of the <br />cyanide? Will acids be stored on site? Could deadly cyanide ga° be <br />formed by unforeseen or careless use of these deadly chemicals'' In bad <br />weather could a transportation accident release these chemical; on the <br />roads leading to the mine, causing a disastrous spill into the <br />environment? <br />I find nowhere in the Battle Mountain plan (Section H or Aquatic <br />Biological Survey appendix) where they clearly define how they plan to <br />protect this mountain ecology from their intrusion. Their statements <br />concerning fish species seem to reflect an acknowledgment that no -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.