Laserfiche WebLink
6. The ackion of the Defendant Board taken fn April of 1980, <br />is arbitrary and capricious and procedurally invalid and legally void <br />for the Defendant's failure to comply t~ith applicable.statutea and rules, <br />including, but not limited to: <br />a) The failure to auba~it the modified resolution to <br />the County Pianning Commission for approval as required <br />by @30-28-116 and 830-28-112, C,R.S, 1973. <br />b) Tha failure to hold a public fleeting on said modified <br />reaolutfon ae required by 830-28-116 and b30-28-112, C,R.S. <br />1973. <br />c) Failure to submit the modified zoning plan to the <br />entire membership of the Board of County Commissioners as <br />required by 830-28-112 and 630-28-116, C.R.S. 1973. <br />d) The failur® of the two named Board members to carry <br />out the policy decisions of the ma}ority of the Board of <br />County Commissioners as required by Sac. 3.6 of the Rules of <br />Procedure for Larimer County (adopted April !0, 1979}. Sce <br />Attached Exhibit E incorporated herein by reference. <br />e) The failure of two Board cRembers to act at a regularly <br />scheduled or special meeting as required by Sec. 1.1 and <br />Sac, 1.2, and Sec. 7.1 of the Pules of Procedure for Larir~er <br />County. <br />f) Failure to adhere to specified procedure for <br />permitting uses by special review as set out in Sec. 24.7, <br />Larimer County Cor.+prehensive Zoning Resolutions and in sub- <br />division (5), including but not limited to, which requires <br />public hearings on special review to be open to the public. <br />(See attached ExhibiC F incorporated herein by reference.) I <br />7. The Findings and Resolutions of the Respondent Board <br />