My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE133683
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE133683
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:34:20 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 1:27:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979191
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/23/1980
Doc Name
COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approximately 360 acres of real property within the County of <br />Larimer. <br />4. On November 23, 1979, the Respondent Board executed <br />Findings and Resolutions granting permission to Petitioner to operate <br />a san and gravel git upon Three Bells Ranch,:,br~~_prohi.bited the <br />maintenance and operating o£ asphalt and concrete bitch plants and <br />made approval subject to She conditions that Three Bell Ranch <br />Associates do the followings <br />a), Hard surface the designated county roads to county <br />etandaads and at their expense. <br />b) Provide a hydrological study by s qualified <br />hydrological engineer and determine that no adverse <br />impacts will exist to the water level in the area, said <br />study to be comgleted within 90 days of November 28. 1479. <br />c) Provide an acceptable collateralized road improve- <br />went plan as well as meet the prior conditions of approval. <br />5. Upon information and belief, in April of 1980 and sub- <br />sequent to November 28, 1479, the two Board members, Commissioner <br />Hotchkiss and Commissi©uer Weitzel, modified and/or changed the con- <br />ditfona of approval withouC a public or Board hearing in the following <br />manner: <br />e) Hard suffaced haul roads to county standards were <br />no longer a condition of approval Ito mitigate impacts <br />presented at prior public meetings. <br />b) Three Bells Ranch's required hydrological study was <br />not dose by a qualified hydrologist with an engineering <br />degree, qet it was so accepted. <br />c) A collateralized road improvement plan was not aub- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.