My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:34 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
APPENDICES A & B
Section_Exhibit Name
Coal Transportation - TRANSPORTATION EA Removed by MR108 6/29/04
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Meeting <br />• May 25, 1983 <br />Paye Three <br />1. The road would be in a trench, minimizing noise transmission. <br />2. Berms. <br />3. Noise barriers - walls made of masonry or wood. The noise barriers <br />would be constructed at specified locations on both sides of the road. <br />• <br />CWI proposed to operate the haul road 16 hours per day, utilizing multiple <br />unit trucks. There would also be a turn-out constructed for repair of <br />trucks. Kathy emphasized that there would be some affect to visual <br />resources. She also stated that there would be an affect on noise in resi- <br />dences located between 200 ft, and 500 ft, away. She emphasized the safety <br />features of the trucks by dun ping their loads to slow them down, retarders, <br />and fake brakes. Although there would be some wildlife habitat loss, the <br />affect is minimal, <br />CWI answered specific questions about the alternatives. <br />Matt presented information on the economics of various systems. He empha- <br />sized that the comparison would be between the private haul road and the <br />road and short conveyor. Neither one of the alternatives would make us <br />money. It in fact, makes us less competitive. There would be a point in <br />which the road and short conveyor would cost less than the private haul <br />road. <br />Matt reported that the cost of a private haul road is 2.1 to 3.2 million <br />dollars. The capital cost for the road and conveyor is 3.5 to 4.5 million <br />dollars. The variance in costs was dependent on specific requirements and <br />contingencies. <br />He stated that we would try to construct the lowest cost conveyor possible. <br />Based on that, he determined that at 1.8 million tons a year and at current <br />truckiny costs and anticipated construction costs, the two alternative cost <br />would be equal. The decision to construct will also be dependent on the <br />number of reserves within the long-term lease. <br />Questions were answered on the economics of the alternatives. After these <br />questions, Chris summarized the presentation by CWI. He emphasized the fol- <br />lowiny, We would rather yo down Colorado 133 in the existing transportation <br />corridor. If Colorado 133 could not be used, we would prefer the private <br />haul road. If enough tonnages and reserves were justified (1 .8 million tons <br />a year for 25 years), we would feel comfortable in constructing the road and <br />short conveyor, <br />He asked the public to <br />leasiny, He also asked <br />another portal need be <br />support us in obtaining the lease and in our future <br />the public to support us in future marketiny and if <br />constructed. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.