My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:34 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:30:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
APPENDICES A & B
Section_Exhibit Name
Coal Transportation - TRANSPORTATION EA Removed by MR108 6/29/04
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING NOTES <br />• <br /> <br /> <br />PUBLIC MEETING <br />May 25, 1983 <br />SUBJECT: Discussion of Transportation Alternatives <br />Representing Colorado Westmoreland 1nc.: Chris Seglem, Art Garcia, Melvin <br />Madril, Kathy Gordon and Matt Sakurada <br />Chris began the meeting by stating that this meeting would be more informal <br />than the May 4, 1983, meetiny. We had received input that CWI dominated the <br />the last meeting and people would appreciate an opportunity to give more <br />input. <br />Chris reviewed the agenda as follows: <br />alternative. <br />2. Discussion of the economic considerations. <br />3. Elimination of some of the alternatives based on community input. <br />1. Short presentations by CWI on alternatives and potential impacts. He <br />asked that people hold questions until the end of discussion of each <br />Chris emphasized that the construction of the alternatives is a timing ques- <br />tion. The construction must weigh the financial and environmental impact <br />considerations. He expressed hope that together we could do what was best <br />for the community. <br />Matt reviewed the order of presentation of alternatives as follows: <br />1. Aerial tram, <br />2. Overland Conveyor, <br />3. Frontage road, <br />4. Pneumatic capsule pipeline, <br />5. Road and short conveyor, <br />6. Private haul road, <br />7. Economics. <br />Aerial Tram <br />Matt reviewetl the requirements of the aerial tram and, based on an excessive <br />amount of environmental impact, ruled out the aerial tram. <br />Overland Conveyor <br />Matt presented the information on the overland conveyor. The conveyor would <br />be in two stages and the transfer station would he at the approximate loca- <br />tion of the CWI substation. Matt stated that a decision on the overland <br />conveyor would be ruled out for riyht now hecause the economic feasibility <br />was justified only at very larye tonnages. <br />Frontaue Road <br />Matt discussed the requirements of the frontage road which would parallel <br />Colorado 133. This would require an overpass at the intersection of <br />Steven's Gulch Road and Colorado 133. This alternative was ruled out <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.