My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE132316
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
400000
>
PERMFILE132316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:33:06 PM
Creation date
11/26/2007 12:06:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/28/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Revegetation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• More importantly, the pathway of succession may be different due to drastic site changes (including <br />substrate and soil stmcture) on mined lands and climatic patterns different from that which were <br />present during establishment and development of these communities. Mountain brush vegetation <br />types with tall shrub species represent well-established clonal communities that aze hundreds and <br />perhaps thousands of years old (Dr. David Buckner, personal communication, 1992), Reproduction <br />is almost exclusively by asexual means with little or no establishment from seed. Furthermore, the co- <br />dominant tall shrub species, Gambel oak, occurs at the limit of its range extension and evidence <br />suggests that it became established in a period with more different and wetter climatic conditions than <br />now (Neilson and Wallstein, 1986). Reclaimed site conditions aze faz more xeric than native sites, <br />probably even drier than the more xeric of the native sites, the sagebrush grassland type. Mesic <br />conditions, in part sustained by the communities themselves, have played an important role in the <br />establishment of the tall shrub communities. This, combined with other site conditions, has <br />maintained their presence. <br />The highly competitive and well established stands of vegetation (seeded or unseeded) established in <br />reclaimed areas helps stabilize sites and return a functioning ecosystem. However, these stands also <br />• slow the establishment of tall shrubs. Mcl,cnden and Redente (1990) found in studies on succession <br />patterns in a disturbed sagebrush community, that after 12 years a disturbed sagebrush site initially <br />dominated by grasses, continued to be dominated by grasses. Seneca II Mine observations of 15-yeaz- <br />old reclaimed azeas adjacent to undisturbed native tall shrub stands indicate that little ox no extension <br />of these well established shrub clonal communities has occurred in the reclaited azeas. Monitoring <br />of revegetation at the neazby Seneca II Mine since 1985 shows initial reestablishment of shrubs may <br />be favorable, but the density quickly drops off as the puennial herbaceous spedes establish. Tall <br />shrub spedes are the most affected by the declines. The trend by 1993 shows somewhat of a leveling <br />off in shrub density since the late 1980s. This is in spite of a large shrub and tree plant program and <br />maximum use of duect haul topsoil. The composition of shrubs in reclaimed azeas tends to <br />predominate with big sagebrush and snowberry. Any increase in reclaimed area shrub density usually <br />comes from these two species. These to species also occur in native plant communities with a high <br />composition of perennial herbaceous spedes. This, combined with site changes resulting from <br />mining disturbance, may ultimately result in these two spedes being the dominant shrubs in the <br />reclaimed plant communities and hence, one may antidpate a sagebrush grassland community <br />dominating reclaimed landscapes many years from now. <br />• The only effective means of stabilizing reclaimed sites quickly is to use seed mixes with a high <br />composition of perennial grass speaes. On the other hand, to provide any opportunity for shrub <br />PR-02 47 Revised 01/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.