Laserfiche WebLink
<br />R' <br />Mr. James L. <br />February 20, <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Schmieding <br />1978 <br /> <br />The DWR estimates appear to be high. We have been unable to <br />find a statutory requirement for augmentation. If there is <br />such a requirement, we would appreciate being advised. <br />3. The DWR again returns to the subject of augmentation <br />for evaporation. Our application states that "all uses of <br />water occurring because of the reclamation plan will be <br />minimal as compared to the cantaloupe crop being replaced." <br />We did not and do not now include evaporation. Our state- <br />ment is correct. <br />4. We verify that no damage to other water users will <br />occur because of the elimination of the irrigation lateral. <br />The lateral exists only on and for the subject property. <br />(See map Exhibit C-1.) <br />If we can be of further assistance in responding to the DWR <br />memorandum, please let us know. <br />Yours truly, <br />Frank Jv e <br />Executive Vice President <br />