Laserfiche WebLink
_v _~ ._ . <br />:OLORfDO DEPAR7MENTOF}IEALTN. Waster Qunltq~Contral4ivi.rian - ~ ~ ~ '-' <br />'ntionrtle - Pnge /0 Permit No. 00.0038024 <br />gage 7 <br />ALB. 1. <br />:able V!-6 It was noted [hat the pH Sample Type has changed from !rt-Situ to Grab. Are we to continue recording and reporting 'field' <br />pHs as in the past or has there been a change in the requirement. In-situ is the correct sampling methodology. This has <br />been corrected to reflect this. <br />'ERMIT <br />Jote~ Outfa[Is 23 and 29 should be removed from the permit as previously stated. All reference to these outja!/s has been <br />removed. <br />'age / <br />.A.I. For each ojthe autjalls listed it was noted that Salinity limitations were listed as a '30-Day Avg:' and not Quarterly as stated <br />in the Rationale artd Monitorixg Requirements. This should be changed to reflect the Quarterly requirement. The current <br />permit addresses the Salinity limitations in A.4. using a list ofa[I outfalls with quarterly sampling. Done <br />A.1. (d) TDS has been added to the effluent /imitations for this outfall. It appears that the writer may have intended this to read <br />Salinity instead. Please change this to read Salinity to remain consistent with the Rationale and remairsder of the Permit. <br />'age 3 <br />A.3. It should be noted that the area draining to I2P-1 Pond (outfall 002) has bewt recontaured and reclaimed. Done <br />• 'age 5 <br />B.I. (d) & (eJ Since the WWTP discharges to ¢n industrial pond and not waters of the US or state is sampling and reporting still required <br />by law? The discharge monitoring aj the W{VTP is required, because it results in a discharge to State waters. In this <br />case, State wafers ate the conveyances used to transfer the {VWTP discharge to the plant ponds (PPl) then to [he <br />evaporation ponds. Bath groundwater and surface waters are considered to be State waters in this situa[ian. <br />If the permittee demonstrates that the ponds are not discharging to State waters, they may gel reliejjrom monitoring. <br />The flow measurement for Outfal1045 should 6e from [he effluent (d) and not the influent (e). Done <br />'age 11 <br />F4. BME has severs[ outfa(Is permitted that we do asst intend to discharge from in the near future. Therefore, we request that the <br />condition for installing and maintaining Jlow-measuring devices be amended to read as follows: <br />"Ij not already ¢ part of the permitted jaciliry, within ninety (90) days after the effective date of the permit nr ,~rinr to <br />A'cr o whirAover is later allow measuring device shall be installed... " Done <br />'age l2 <br />'figure 1 The loca6an ofthe jaciliry is off Several copies of a corrected map are attached for inclusion. Done <br />'ages 13-/5 <br />'figures 2 & 3 The figures need to 6e updated to remove outfalls 023 and 029. Several copies of an updated map are attached with outfal/s <br />023 and 029 deleted and that are legible. Done <br />Christaph er L. Gates <br />April 22, 2002 <br />• <br />