Laserfiche WebLink
-~ 9708648287 COTTER NUCLR 062 P01 SI III IIIIII'IIIIII~III <br />• • 9s9 <br />COTTER CORPORATION 28151 DD Road <br />~ P.O. Boz 700 <br />Western Slope Operations Phone (970) 864-7347 <br />Nucla, CO 81424-0700 Fax (970) 864-7287 <br />September 28, 1999 <br />RECEIVED <br />OCT O1 1999 <br />Division of Mineray g G <br />~~y <br />Mr. Wallace Erickson <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />484 TtYttter Drive, Building F, Suite 101 ! <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />Post-it• Fax Note 9671 ati~l S ~,- 3 <br />7oWM1 £RGKS.~ F1b1n ~ ~r~1r <br />co.ioao~.O co. <br />Phone • Phone <br />Fu A Fe:1 <br />Received <br />Re: Permit No. M-77-306, JD-9 Mine, response to bond re-calculation costs '~P Q $ ~!-Iy~. <br />Dear Mr. Erickson: Durango Field Office <br />Division or Minerals & Geology <br />Cotter Corporation is in receipt of your notice to increase the 5nancial warranty for the above <br />`~- captioned mine. Cotta wrrently carries a 515,700 DMG bond and a 572,000 bond held with <br />Lt.l r a acific Insurance company, to satisfy the DOE requirements. Increasing the State of Colorado <br />!~ O ~ bond amount from $15,700 to $43,949 would place the total finanaal warranty at almost <br />~ ~ ~ o ~ $I 16,000. It would appear to be somewhat excessive. According to Cotter's calculations, the <br />~t° t M <br />~ _, ] ~ ~ bond amount should be S31,672. <br />`' r q In response to the Division's recommendation, Cotter has prepared a revised reclamation cost <br />~~ ~ h' estimate. This revised reclamation cost estimate is based upon a review of the Division's 21 pages <br />~ `r ; •, i ; ; ~ of summaries, worksheets and data sheets used to estimate DMG's cost of reclamation. <br />;- <br />`' " ~ ~J ~ ~:; 1 Cotter's review of the Division's cost estimate is summarized in the following paragraphs. In <br />addition, Cotter has prepared Table I (see attached) which summarizes DMG's and Cotter's <br />reclamation cost estimates. <br />Task Ml Demolish and remove all mining structures and debris. <br />DMG's cost estimate of 513,082 is based on a shop building of 72' long x 40' wide x 12' high, and <br />disposing of six PCB contaminated transformers. <br />Cotter agrees with all item costs in Task No. 1 except these two items: The shop building is 68' <br />long x 40' wide x 12' high; and there are no PCB contaminated transformers on site. Cotter's cost <br />estimate is 510,915. <br />Task N2 Seal and safeguard edit and vent holes. <br />DMG has proposed sealing the three vent holes by purchasing two pre-fabricated panels at a cost <br />of 53,978. <br />Cotter proposes to use thrtc pieces of the reinforced concrete shop/dry floor, rather than <br />purchasing new prefab concrete panels to close the vent holes. This cost has been deducted from <br />the total sealing cost. <br />