Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />-85- <br />MR. JOUFLAS: Okay. Why don't you go ahead, Dean? <br />MR. MASSE Y: Okay. I'm going to ask Anne -- Anne prepared the permit <br />application, Anne's most familiar with where these things are located and how <br />we've addressed them. We may need to call up additional experts, but we'll go <br />through 'em one at a time. I think the legal argument's in "A" we'll get to <br />later. <br />MS. BALDRIGE: So, I guess we'll start with B-1. An adequate slurry wall <br />must be constructed along the south wall of the west pit to prevent dewatering <br />of the Rito Sec o. Designs for that slurry wall which the Mined Land Division <br />Staff has found to be adequate were submitted on March 2, 1989, as additional <br />adequacy concerns. <br />The -- Battle Mountain has failed to demonstrate that there will be no <br />acid generation. I believe we resolved that question in an earlier <br />• discussion. Battle Mountain has failed to provide mill facility designs <br />specifications. Battle Mountain has committed to providing those <br />specifications when the mill is actually designed. They are very reluctant to <br />proceed with a lot of design specifications til they're insured they have the <br />necessary permits that will allow them to, in fact, design and bwild a mill. <br />MR. DANIELSON: Will that be a technical revision? Or will it somehow <br />wind up being reviewed? <br />MS. BALDRIGE: It will -- it will be reviewed by the Staff. It's a <br />commitment at this point to do that. It will be submitted in the form of some <br />sort of permit revision. <br />MR. HOLDER: The basic process of the mill and so on is a part of this <br />permit? <br /> <br />