Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-~o- <br />MR. JOHNSON: It's a very small catchment area, it's not very significant <br />in the overall picture. And I think, that that map is actually incorrect in <br />the date. Most of that drainage area goes the other way off the saddle, but <br />it does not matter one way or the other. Whatever the actual drainage area is <br />was incorporated in the design of that diversion. <br />MR. MASSEY: Jim, could you reiterate the conservatism associated with <br />that design? <br />MR. JOHNSON: Well, once again, that diversion ditch is going to be required <br />to handle approximately 228 cfs based on the 100-year 24-hour staorm, and it is <br />capable of handling, let's see -- 1,580 cfs, if full. <br />MR. MASSEY: So, it's approximately five times over designl <br />• MR. JOHNSON: No, about seven. And the ditch is designed as a rip-rap <br />facility to control erosion damage, etc.. <br />MR. MASSEY: Thanks. <br />MR. BARRY: Just one last question. Charlie, is your level of comfort <br />increased at all, based on this discussion. <br />MR. JAQUEZ: My problem -- ~ problem is that they're on tops of our water <br />supply. You know, I don't really care about tributaries or all that stuff. <br />It's on top of our water supply. I mean, the Rito Se co, I forget what the <br />word is, it recharges our water supply. That's out biggest problem. Not all <br />thi s other stuff. <br />MR. MASSEY: If there -- there are no further -- <br />• <br />