My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE129738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE129738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:30:44 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:06:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997086
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/24/1997
Doc Name
BEDROCK MINE 1 FN M-97-086 112 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS APPLICATION PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
SILOAM STONE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />M-97-071 <br />Page 5 <br />the post-mining land use, the area obviously supports a wide variety of wildlife which could be <br />disrupted or even displaced depending on the proposed reclamation plan. For instance, the area <br />is widely vegetated by pinonfjuniper woodlands interspersed with blue grama dominated <br />rangelands. The proposal to not replace any trees will most certainty change the habitat <br />requirements of any wildlife that rely upon the occurrence of the pinon/juniper woodlands. <br />Under tfie current submittal, this decision must be re-evaluated. In addition, the surface water <br />drainage patterns will likely be altered based on the fact that runoff values for woodlands and <br />grasslands aze different and portions of the existing drainages could be completely altered. <br />It is also stated that there is no water on this land, however, during the Division's pre-operational <br />inspection, it was obvious that the Peck Creek tributary definitely contains a significant source of <br />water for both domestic livestock and wildlife use. The potential impact to this source of water <br />must also be addressed in the reclamation plan. <br />(d) Please identify where the topsoil piles will be located within each mining and reclamation <br />phase. This is important to know so that push distances can be accurately determined for <br />reclamation liability cost estimating. <br />(e) The reclamation timetable concept on page 25 is unclear to the Division. Does this <br />timetable kick in when mining is completely finished? Once again, a more detailed <br />description of each 20 acre phase should be included here. This may include a map <br />generally illustrating how many acres aze being actively mined, how many acres have <br />been regraded, top soiled, seeded, and how many acres are ready for warranty release. <br />(~ (ii) As discussed in the Pinon Mine application, crested wheatgrass has some <br />undesirable growth traits and has a tendency to exclude other more desirable grass <br />species if seeded too heavily. There aze other more desirable species that will fill <br />the same niche as crested wheatgrass such as pubescent wheatgrass or slender <br />wheatgrass that should be substituted into the proposed mix. Also, during the <br />Division's pre-operational inspection, Little bluestem was observed growing on <br />the site and would be an excellent addition to the seed mix. <br />(iv) As mentioned earlier, if the entire area is slab mined as proposed, there will be a <br />significant impact to the pinon/juniper woodlands in the permit area. Therefore, a <br />proposal to replace some of this habitat should be included in this section. <br />6.4.6 EXHIBIT F- Reclamation Plan Maa <br />(b) The reclamation plan map should also include the proposed final land use for each <br />portion of the affected lands <br />6.4.7 EXHIBIT G- Water information <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.