My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE128993
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE128993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:26:05 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:56:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/8/1984
Doc Name
C-JD-8 MINE FN M-84-014
From
MLRD
To
COTTER CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M. D. Hester -2- Mar h 8, 1984 <br />Maas <br />The Exhibit C map of the C-JD-B mine (portal site) is of ode uate scale <br />to illustrate the disturbance here. It would be helpful to llustrate <br />the area of the production shaft, etc., located on top of th mesa, in a <br />similar manner. <br />2. Similar to the comment given in number 1 immediately above, a would <br />encourage the inclusion of a reclamation map for the product on shaft <br />site of suitable scale to help better portray the post-minln topography <br />of this site. <br />3. Access roads are considered part of the affected lands. Thel maps should <br />clearly illustrate the location of all access roads to be used in <br />conjunction with this operation (those roads other than public roads). <br />The application should then discuss the manner in which you will <br />minimize excess downslope spoiling on the steeper portions f any cut <br />and fill slopes. And, provide a plan of reclamation for al such <br />accesses. <br />Reclamation Plan <br />1. Information given regarding understory vegetation shows tha galleta <br />accounts for approximately 20% of the total cover. However, this <br />species is not given in the proposed seed mixture, and we suggest that <br />it be incorporated. <br />Also, because of the aggressive nature of yellow sweetclov~r, we suggest <br />that you cut the proposed rate by 75% to 0.5 lb/ac. <br />2. we strongly recommend the inclusion of mulch (suggest 2 to~s/acre hay, <br />crimped) to help promote revegetation efforts. <br />3. Grazing should be prohibited until vegetation has an opportunity to <br />establish. <br />4. There should be a plan to appropriately secure adits and shafts (Rule <br />6.1{e)). <br />5. Considering the fact that erosion is accelerated on steep slopes and the <br />long-term adherence of topsoil is thus questionable, the pplication <br />should discuss the erosion control practices which will b implemented <br />to improve stability (e g, rough grading, contour furrows etc.). <br />6. The application mentions a plan to combine fine fractions from the waste <br />rock dump with topsoil to increase the volume of availabl plant growth <br />medium. <br />The Division requests some additional information regarding the expected <br />nature of the waste. Such information may Include: expe ted volumes of <br />fines, expected size fractions, chemical and radiogenic ature of the <br />waste, and any other information regarding the sultab111 y of this <br />material. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.