Laserfiche WebLink
~C <br />of well P-4. Water levels were monitored through nearly 80 minutes of pumping. <br />Recovery of well P-4 was also monitored. Drawdowns in well P-4 were corrected for <br />aquifer thinning. <br />Figure A-26 presents [he semi-log plot of the drawdown data. The early time <br />data of the plot was used because discharge rate decreased significantly after <br />initial pumping time. Analysis of the straight line fit of the drawdown data yields <br />a transmissivity of 9 gal/day/ft and permeability of .02 ft/day. <br />Using the recovery method to also analyze the straight line fit of the <br />recovery data plotted on Figure A-27, a transmissivity of nearly one gal/day/ft is <br />obtained. Permeability using the recovery was calculated to be .O1 ft/day. These <br />are thought to be representative values for the Second White Sandstone aquifer near <br />• well P-4. <br />A-2.22 P-5 TEST <br />A single well pump test was conducted October 2, 1980 on well P-5. The Second <br />White Sandstone aquifer was tested near well P-5. Table A-25 presents the aquifer- <br />test data for well P-5: Aquifer thinning correction was applied to the drawdowns <br />listed in Table A-25. <br />Using Jacob's method to analyze the.straight line fit of the data in Figure <br />A-28, a transmissivity of 780 gal/day/ft is obtained. Permeability was calculated <br />to be 10 ft/day. <br />• ( Figure A-29 presents the semi-log plot of the recovery data. A transmissivity <br />A-13 RElIISED FEB 13 'B7 <br />