Laserfiche WebLink
39 <br />(~ <br />These factors bring to mind questions such as: when <br />should grazing begin after rehabilitation, how should <br />fences be placed to control grazing, what degree of utili- <br />zation can be permitted without harm to plant vigor and <br />sand stability, and what can be done to replace the forage <br />lost during mining and rehabilitation? <br />There is more than one way to resolve those questions, <br />but the final plan should provide mutual understanding <br />between the company, the ranchers, and the Soil Conservation <br />Service. Consider, for example, the question: when should <br />grazing begin after rehabilitation? Unless regulations <br />require protection for several years, the best answer is <br />a composite of biological, economic, and logistical factors. <br />Because the management and durability of rehabilitated <br />areas needs to be developed and demonstrated at an early <br />time, we would like to propose the initiation of carefully <br />controlled grazing in late summer or fall in the year after <br />seeding. But, grazing of newly seeded areas in common with <br />larger areas of either existing range or of older rehabili- <br />tated range is hazardous because the new stands attract <br />grazing animals and, thus, suffer excessive grazing, which <br />reduces the tall-grass component. These factors suggest <br />an intensive plan of fencing each seeded parcel separately <br />(. and of keeping it separate for about four years before com- <br />bining the parcels into larger units. Economic factors <br />must be considered at this point because the grazing <br />obtained, when the annual increment of land rehabilitated <br />is expected to be about 30 acres, would not justify much <br />cost in fencing and water development. With such an inten- <br />sive plan, justification would derive largely from the <br />value of management experience and demonstration of vege- <br />tative stability. <br />A less intensive plan would involve fencing areas of, <br />say, 160 acres or more to exclude livestock during mining <br />and rehabilitation. Grazing then would not begin until the <br />whole paddock had been rehabilitated and the newest parcel <br />was fully stabilized. Furthermore, the area should be <br />mowed in early spring to a stubble height of about 6 inches <br />to promote uniform distribution of grazing. With this plan, <br />the value of management experience obtained is diminished <br />and delayed, and the value of lost grazing increases, with <br />increase in size of area so treated. <br />Utilization standards should be developed as rehabili- <br />tated areas are placed under grazing. Those standards <br />. should specify the height and/or amount of herbage that <br />must not be grazed -- that is, the amount of herbage needed <br />to maintain sand stability, vigor of forage plants, and <br />l balance between short and tall grasses. We can provide <br />only preliminary standards, as follows: the average height <br />