My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE127164
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE127164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:24:17 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:19:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003091
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/7/2004
Doc Name
Letter of Objection
From
Bernard Lyons Gaddis & Kahn
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TETRA TECH RMC Ms. Madoline Wallace <br />January 5, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br />Exhibit E- "7he Smith-Emmons ditch fs located Z00 feet from the western properrl~ boundmy and will be <br />relocated along the western edge of the property. The mining boundary minimum offset from the western <br />property line is 10 feet. Once the deposit is removed overburden will be compacted for dte new ditch <br />according to engineered build (sic) plans taking into consideration water floaa~ rates and allorming for the 70- <br />joot easement." <br />Exhibit F - Includes a label along the western property boundary stating "Smidr & Emmons Ditch Relocation", <br />and another label in the vicinity stating "70.0' Easement". <br />Exhibit G - "A portion of the Smith and Enmtons ditch will 6e relocated Yo facilitate mining." <br />Exhibit L - $150,000 of Performance Bond is allocated for Smith & Emmons ditch relocation. <br />Geotechnical Stability Exhibit - "Therefore, we reconmrend that there bean offset ofa minimum of 50 feet <br />from waterways, where no mining takes place. From that paint, the 3: ]slope discussed above would be <br />applicable." <br />With such little information to review we can only offer general comments at this time. Approval by <br />the Ditch Company of any relocation of the Smith & Emmons Ditch can only be recommended after <br />review of detailed plans for the protection, removal, and relocation of the ditch including any <br />appurtenant structures required for the relocation. <br />Lafarge should provide the following for review: <br />1) Detailed mining plan and schedule. A plan and schedule of how mining will proceed <br />prior to relocation of the ditch, and when that relocation is proposed to be accomplished <br />is needed. The ditch must be kept in continual service throughout the irrigation seasons <br />of April through October. Relocation of the ditch may only take place in the non- <br />imgation season and only with approval of the Ditch Company. <br />2) Detailed construction plans and specifications for the new segment of the ditch. The <br />plans should include the locations, elevations, grades and cross-sections of the new ditch, <br />the materials and methods of construction proposed to be used in the reconstruction. <br />Detailed plans should also be provided for reconstruction of the concrete division box <br />currently located just north of WCR 20%i so that the wafer will be directed to the west <br />and precluded from being directed east or north. Detailed plans of all new appurtenant <br />structures are also required. <br />3) Detailed plans for any proposed utility crossings of the existing or relocated Ditch. <br />4) Detailed plans for any proposed enclosed pipes to carry the relocated Ditch. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.