My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE127070
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE127070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:24:12 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1993087
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/15/1993
Doc Name
WEEDEN PIT 30 FN M93-087 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
COMMISSIONER BACA COUNTY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl o(Natural Resources <br />7311 Sherman 51 . Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 13031866-7567 <br />FA1(: 13031 87 2-8106 <br />'~ecember 15, 1993 <br />Mr. Ray Miller, Commissioner <br />Baca County <br />741 Main Street <br />PO Box 116 <br />Springfield, CO 81073 <br />Re: Weeden Pit #30, File No. M93-087, Adequacy Review <br />Dear Commissioner Miller, <br />of `O~o <br />~e <br />~.~V'~• <br />rB 16 <br />Ray Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B Long <br />Dwision Direuo~ <br />Thank you for the time you spent with me discussing some of the <br />adequacy items for the Weeden Pit #`30, when you were in our office <br />this week. This letter will reiterate my questions about these <br />items, and some additional items. The Division will need to have <br />these answered before permit approval can be given. The items are <br />explained below: <br />Exhibit B: The windmill mentioned in Exhibit C is a structure. is <br />the windmill within the permit, or within 200 feet of the permit? <br />Are there any fences, pipelines, ditches, etc., that are also <br />located here? The division requires that these and other like <br />items be identified in the text and on a site map, and the <br />potential impacts to them from the mining operation. <br />Exhibit B: Regarding impacts to groundwater, per SB 181, the <br />Division must have information related to depth of groundwater and <br />mitigation of potential impacts (ie., fuel or antifreeze spills). <br />Is equipment to be serviced on site? Will fuel be stored on site? <br />Exhibit C: item 4. The reference to "clay deposit" is unclear, <br />since application is for sand and gravel. Please provide a revised <br />statement of reserve(s) to be extracted (especially regarding the <br />sand and gravel depths). <br />Exhibit C: Item 5. Regarding the windmill, if it is within the <br />permit or the 200-foot envelope, please provide the owner's <br />clearance or agreement of liability for damage. <br />Exhibit C: Items 5 and 7. will the "road" referred to here remain <br />after mining ends or be reclaimed? <br />(cont.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.