PERMFILE126929 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M-95-005/Adequacy 4/4/95 page 4 EXHIBIT M - OTHER PERMITS AND LICENSES Though this is not a problem, I wish to clarify some language contained in the county air emissions permit. Twice it mentions that the existing permit {used at your MLRB permit M-90-145 site) is sufficient to be used here also, because it is an "expansion area." This new site is not contiguous to, nor an expansion of, the other site, in the Division's eyes. It is a separate permit. Please be reminded that because you propose to mine a hillside, and the pit will daylight to the drainage path of the site, you may have a potential for stormwater runoff, and if not contained, may constitute an off site discharge. You should consider contacting the Colorado Department of Health/Water Quality Control Division to inquire about the need for a stormwater management permit on your site. EXHIBIT Q - PROOF OF MAILING NOTICES OF PERMIT APPLICATION We discussed the fact that it appears the wrong soil conservation entity was sent a notice by you. The Rules specify that if the proposed site is situated within a "soil conservation district," that district must be sent a notice. You must therefore notify the Mesa Soil Conservation District, 2754 Compass Dr., Suite 170, Grand Junction 81506. For technical assistance, the formerly-known Soil Conservation Service (SCS) is whom to contact. That federal agency is now called the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). EXHIBIT R - PROOF OF FILING WITH THE COUNTY CLERK Please be reminded that all future correspondence, maps, etc., must also be placed on file at the clerk's office. Please review the "Notice Procedures" as shown on page 3 of the application packet {immediately before the actual application page 1). You must provide proof of notification of all owners of affected land and all land within 200 feet of the proposed site. The landowners, which should be shown on a map in Exhibit C, should be notified. This would seem to include Mesa County (west, south and east sides) and possibly owners to the northeast of the north- central point (unless the boundary is modified there slightly moving it southward). Acceptable proof may be return receipts of certified mail. I acknowledge that I received the proof of publication (as corrected) from you during our meeting. The public comment period ended on March 28, 1995, with no comment received, aside from the item I mentioned under Exhibit G, above. The decision date is still May 8, 1995. Please try to provide your responses to me soon, I will begin the calculations for the bond soon, but will delay final figures for a couple of weeks.