My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE126929
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE126929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:24:05 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/4/1995
Doc Name
ORCHARD MESA AGGREGATES FN M-95-005 ADEQUACY REVIEW LETTER
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN REGION CORP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.- <br /> <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DeparlmeN of Natural Resources <br />131 3 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 II~~~ <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FA%.130)18)2-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br />April 4, 1995 NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br />Sandra R. DuCray Roy Romer <br />Mountain Region Corp. Governor <br />117 29-3/4 Road IamesS lochhead <br />Grand Junction CO 81503 Executive Director <br /> Michael B. Long <br />Re: Orchard Mesa Aggregates, File No. M-95-005, Div ision Director <br />Adequacy Review Letter <br />Dear Ms. DuCray, <br />Thank you for the time you spent with me, discussing your new 112 <br />permit application, as named above. I will try to both reiterate <br />my questions and. concerns, plus the points which were clarified <br />during our meeting, as I understand them. I will attempt to be as <br />comprehensive as possible in this letter, to minimize the number of <br />letters written regarding this adequacy review. In your responses <br />to this letter, please try to provide all information requested as <br />soon as you can, to speed along the review. I have arranged all <br />items noted in this letter by the exhibit in which they belong. <br />Where I have not mentioned an exhibit in this letter, I do not have <br />any specific question or comment about it at this time. <br />EXHIBIT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION <br />The description is of an area comprising about 106 acres, and <br />presumably describes entire properties owned by you, within which <br />the permit area is situated. Your permit area description should <br />include additional information, specifying that only 46.1 acres <br />within those parcels will comprise the permit area itself. <br />EXHIBIT B - INDEX MAP <br />The index map, like the description in Exhibit A, depicts the <br />entire parcels within which the permit area is located. Please <br />modify the index map to delineate only the permit area itself. You <br />might also eliminate the blank strip of map margin which presently <br />runs through the middle of the index map and permit area. <br />EXHIBIT C - PRE-MINING AND MINING PLAN MAPS <br />There should be at least two maps, as the name of this exhibit <br />indicates. The map you submitted may be most appropriate as a pre- <br />mining map, but it still has several deficiencies. The permit <br />boundary is incorrectly labeled, there are no adjacent property <br />owners' names shown, none of the structures (roads, fences, <br />powerlines) that fall within 200 feet or inside the permit area are <br />shown or labeled, and there is no indication of surface topography <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.