My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE126659
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE126659
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:23:50 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/30/2004
Doc Name
Objections
From
Corey Y. Hoffmann and Hilary Mogue Graham
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phillip Wolf <br />P.O. Box 16804 . <br />Golden, Co. 80402 <br />November 17, 2003 <br />Chuck Binford <br />Dept. of Transportation <br />Yegion 1 18500 E. Colfax <br />Aurora, CO. 80011 <br />''Dear Mr. Binford, <br />RNO~'~ <br />~7~ <br />I <br />~.~ al <br />The reason for this letter is in reference to Permit#103039, <br />addtional terms and conditions, and the relevence to stipulation <br />#7, needing County approval. If you remember, I had discussed <br />this with you earlier, and why, this by Law, cannot be required. <br />I'm attaching somenI would like you to review, or have reviewed. <br />exti,b:+s <br />What I need from C.D.O.T. is to show cause, to me, what Law or <br />Statute would supersede the references provided to C.D.O.T. that <br />allows any County Commissioner, to prohibit use's of an appurtence <br />of one's own land.Our State Statute prohibit any denial of use <br />passed on to a Patentee, from Federal lands, by County Commissioner's, <br />Title 1 Article 2 Section 25 Doctrine of Preemption, see case <br />attached: <br />Article 2 Section 25 and Cases Law provided, that deals with <br />intended use and Covenants provided by Executive Order. The use <br />intended, is for Mining. This is a *~~>+~~rt oa*~.,+- -~-~~»~~*+~* <br />coov to vou, signed by Presidential Order and use designated as <br />Mining. The Mining Act of 1872 is all emcomaassinq, and covers all <br />fields related to Mininq. <br />Land is described as from the center of the Earth, to the Heavens <br />and anything and ever~-th~ng} <br />In this description is an appurtent to the Land. This cannot be <br />prohibited by any County! <br />There is simply not jurisdiction at County level or State level. <br />There is no State Stutute that can ever superce~d the Supreme <br />Clause! <br />The other s-~ipulations you've asked for, we expect to work <br />through, on a highway owned, by the Public, and will work hand in <br />hand with C.D.O.T. to provide these conditions, satisfactorily. <br />What I need you to provide me~tsj what Law that you use to require <br />me to seek approval from a Municipality; that can River have <br />jurisdiction over these issues? <br />If there are any questiorn5on these exhibits, please <br />to call me, so these can be discussed. <br />I would apprec e a respons on or before 12/05/03 <br />proceed to ur o er con tions minus Stipulation <br />Sincerely, <br />Philli <br />f <br />don't hesitate <br />or I:will <br />#7. <br />~- <br />~ ~x <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.